From: Witukind <witukind@nsbm.kicks-ass.org>
To: Ed Sweetman <ed.sweetman@wmich.edu>
Cc: ed.sweetman@wmich.edu, mru@kth.se, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: udev sysfs docs Re: State of devfs in 2.6?
Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2003 22:31:58 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20031210223158.7ecfc11a.witukind@nsbm.kicks-ass.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3FD787AF.8080902@wmich.edu>
On Wed, 10 Dec 2003 15:53:03 -0500
Ed Sweetman <ed.sweetman@wmich.edu> wrote:
> Ed Sweetman wrote:
> > Witukind wrote:
> >
> >> On Wed, 10 Dec 2003 20:33:24 +0100
> >> mru@kth.se (Måns Rullgård) wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>> Witukind <witukind@nsbm.kicks-ass.org> writes:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>> On Tue, 09 Dec 2003 10:39:32 +0100 mru@kth.se (Måns Rullgård)
> >wrote:>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>>> Is there a specific case for which people want this feature?
> >>>>>> Offhand it seems like a slightly odd thing to ask for...
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> I believe the original motivation for module autoloading was to
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> save> memory by unloading modules when their devices were unused.
> >
> >>>> Loading> them automatically on demand made for less trouble for
> >>>> users, who> didn't have to run modprobe manually to use the sound
> >>>> card, or> whatever. This could still be a good thing in embedded
> >>>> systems.>
> >
> > the biggest advantage from modules is the ability to enable/disable
> > devices with different initialization configurations without
> > rebooting, including the use of devices that aren't present during
> > boot or may be added to a system that cant be put down to reboot.
> > Embedded systems usually do not change, that's just part of being
> > embedded, modules dont really make sense there unless things like
> > filesystems and non-device modules never get used at the same time
> > and memory is limited such that 100KB actually matters.
> >
> >
> >>>> I don't see why it wouldn't be a good thing for regular systems
> >>>> also. Saving memory is usually a good idea.
> >
> >
> > True, but how about we start being good memory users where it counts
> > the most, like gui's/userspace land and then worry about the sub 1MB
> > usage that kernels exist in.
> >
> >>> The biggest modules are about 100k. Saving 100k of 1 GB doesn't
> >>> really seem worth any effort.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> I don't have 1 Gb of memory. On my laptop with 16 mb RAM saving
> >100k > is worth
> >> the effort.
> >
>
> Blah, scratch this.
> > Then why do you use a sylpheed, which is gtk instead of something in
> > a terminal that uses much less memory (doesn't require xfree86,
> > which you're probably also using instead of tinyX) and toolkits,
> > pixmaps etc.
> > Obviously, 100k is not worth _your_ effort.
>
> And of course that's all assuming you're using your laptop to write
> and send email. Which you probably wouldn't be doing on a 16MB
> laptop...probably wouldn't be doing anything on a 16MB laptop. But
> anyway, the rest of what i was talking about is ok.
Well you can do a lot of things on this laptop and Wingdows 95, although I'd
prefer to be able to do as much or even more using Linux with it.
--
Jabber: heimdal@jabber.org
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-12-10 21:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 101+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-12-08 15:36 State of devfs in 2.6? Andrew Walrond
2003-12-08 15:42 ` William Lee Irwin III
2003-12-08 15:59 ` Andrew Walrond
2003-12-08 23:38 ` Greg KH
2003-12-09 10:37 ` Andrew Walrond
2003-12-09 10:57 ` Måns Rullgård
2003-12-09 12:54 ` Paul P Komkoff Jr
2003-12-09 5:04 ` Rob Landley
2003-12-08 19:09 ` udev sysfs docs " Bob
2003-12-08 23:37 ` Greg KH
2003-12-09 5:17 ` Witukind
2003-12-09 7:21 ` Bob
2003-12-09 7:39 ` Matthew Reppert
2003-12-09 8:52 ` Måns Rullgård
2003-12-09 9:16 ` Greg KH
2003-12-09 9:45 ` Måns Rullgård
2003-12-09 9:18 ` Greg KH
2003-12-09 9:46 ` Andreas Jellinghaus
2003-12-09 10:25 ` Måns Rullgård
2003-12-09 15:28 ` Andreas Jellinghaus
2003-12-09 20:16 ` Oliver Hunt
2003-12-09 20:53 ` Måns Rullgård
2003-12-09 22:14 ` Olaf Hering
2003-12-09 22:46 ` Oliver Hunt
2003-12-09 23:03 ` Måns Rullgård
2003-12-09 7:56 ` Greg KH
2003-12-09 9:00 ` Xavier Bestel
2003-12-09 9:08 ` Greg KH
2003-12-09 9:19 ` Miles Bader
2003-12-09 9:39 ` Måns Rullgård
2003-12-09 11:01 ` Helge Hafting
2003-12-12 11:26 ` Jamie Lokier
2003-12-12 13:33 ` Duncan Sands
2003-12-12 14:51 ` Jamie Lokier
2003-12-12 16:34 ` Chuck Campbell
2003-12-12 17:13 ` Chris Friesen
2003-12-12 17:17 ` Måns Rullgård
2003-12-15 2:12 ` Miles Bader
2003-12-15 3:51 ` Mark Mielke
2003-12-15 6:09 ` Tim Connors
2003-12-10 19:23 ` Witukind
2003-12-10 19:33 ` Måns Rullgård
2003-12-10 20:22 ` Witukind
2003-12-10 20:47 ` Ed Sweetman
2003-12-10 20:53 ` Ed Sweetman
2003-12-10 21:31 ` Witukind [this message]
2003-12-10 21:28 ` Witukind
2003-12-10 21:48 ` Måns Rullgård
2003-12-11 6:31 ` Witukind
2003-12-10 21:49 ` Måns Rullgård
2003-12-10 23:48 ` Maciej Zenczykowski
2003-12-11 1:53 ` Mark Mielke
2003-12-11 8:42 ` Måns Rullgård
2003-12-11 16:33 ` Mark Mielke
2003-12-10 20:48 ` Måns Rullgård
2003-12-10 23:40 ` Maciej Zenczykowski
2003-12-09 9:55 ` Xavier Bestel
2003-12-09 13:03 ` Maciej Zenczykowski
2003-12-09 15:01 ` Helge Hafting
2003-12-09 18:30 ` Greg KH
2003-12-09 18:53 ` Måns Rullgård
2003-12-10 7:02 ` Xavier Bestel
2003-12-10 20:06 ` Witukind
2003-12-11 9:27 ` Xavier Bestel
2003-12-11 10:15 ` Måns Rullgård
2003-12-11 11:05 ` Xavier Bestel
2003-12-10 0:38 ` Greg KH
2003-12-09 9:26 ` Måns Rullgård
2003-12-09 9:41 ` Miles Bader
2003-12-10 8:13 ` Jakob Oestergaard
2003-12-10 8:24 ` Rob Landley
2003-12-08 23:04 ` Andreas Jellinghaus
2003-12-08 23:34 ` Greg KH
2003-12-09 0:31 ` Sven-Haegar Koch
2003-12-09 0:42 ` Greg KH
2003-12-09 0:51 ` [PATCH] sysfs support for vcs devices (was Re: State of devfs in 2.6?) Greg KH
2003-12-09 5:26 ` State of devfs in 2.6? Rob Landley
2003-12-09 18:19 ` Greg KH
2003-12-09 18:20 ` Greg KH
2003-12-09 7:02 ` Andreas Jellinghaus
2003-12-09 7:13 ` Murray J. Root
2003-12-09 8:21 ` Holger Schurig
2003-12-09 8:52 ` Miles Bader
2003-12-09 10:08 ` Holger Schurig
2003-12-09 17:10 ` Mark Mielke
2003-12-10 5:42 ` Greg KH
2003-12-10 23:29 ` jw schultz
2003-12-11 20:32 ` [2.4.23] cursor dissapears in framebuffer console after switching back from X Witukind
2003-12-11 23:59 ` Gene Heskett
2003-12-12 6:24 ` Witukind
2003-12-09 8:32 ` State of devfs in 2.6? Greg KH
2003-12-09 9:59 ` Jan Dittmer
2003-12-09 13:54 ` Matthew Reppert
2003-12-09 16:27 ` Greg KH
2003-12-09 16:47 ` Eduard Bloch
2003-12-09 19:33 ` Greg KH
2003-12-10 2:15 ` Clemens Schwaighofer
2003-12-10 4:10 ` Bob
2003-12-09 7:33 ` Vojtech Pavlik
2003-12-09 9:48 ` Andreas Jellinghaus
2003-12-08 23:35 ` Greg KH
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20031210223158.7ecfc11a.witukind@nsbm.kicks-ass.org \
--to=witukind@nsbm.kicks-ass.org \
--cc=ed.sweetman@wmich.edu \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mru@kth.se \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).