From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S264267AbTLJXkg (ORCPT ); Wed, 10 Dec 2003 18:40:36 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S264270AbTLJXkg (ORCPT ); Wed, 10 Dec 2003 18:40:36 -0500 Received: from mtaw4.prodigy.net ([64.164.98.52]:62898 "EHLO mtaw4.prodigy.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S264267AbTLJXkd (ORCPT ); Wed, 10 Dec 2003 18:40:33 -0500 Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2003 15:40:07 -0800 From: Mike Fedyk To: Paul Jakma Cc: venom@sns.it, "Martin J. Bligh" , Marcelo Tosatti , Joe Thornber , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Device-mapper submission for 2.4 Message-ID: <20031210234007.GD15401@matchmail.com> Mail-Followup-To: Paul Jakma , venom@sns.it, "Martin J. Bligh" , Marcelo Tosatti , Joe Thornber , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Dec 10, 2003 at 05:00:43PM +0000, Paul Jakma wrote: > On Wed, 10 Dec 2003 venom@sns.it wrote: > > > DM is back compatible with LVM1, tested and runs well. > > What about the patches posted by Joe last (?) week which remove LVM1 > support from 2.6 DM? (if Linus hasnt picked them up, its surely an If this is what I was reading being discussed a few weeks ago, then the support for the LVM1 sysctls/ioctls has/will be removed, so you will have to use the DM utilities instead of the old LVM1 utilities. LVM1 on-disk format should still be supported.