From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S265105AbTLKPOO (ORCPT ); Thu, 11 Dec 2003 10:14:14 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S265113AbTLKPOO (ORCPT ); Thu, 11 Dec 2003 10:14:14 -0500 Received: from e34.co.us.ibm.com ([32.97.110.132]:17870 "EHLO e34.co.us.ibm.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S265105AbTLKPNl (ORCPT ); Thu, 11 Dec 2003 10:13:41 -0500 Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2003 09:13:31 -0600 From: "Jose R. Santos" To: "Jose R. Santos" Cc: nfs@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [NFS] Problems with NFS while running SpecSFS with JFS filesystem and 2.6 kernel. Message-ID: <20031211151331.GA7920@dbz.austin.ibm.com> References: <20031210144011.GE708@dbz.austin.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT In-Reply-To: <20031210144011.GE708@dbz.austin.ibm.com> (from jrsantos@austin.ibm.com on Wed, Dec 10, 2003 at 08:40:11 -0600) X-Mailer: Balsa 2.0.15 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 12/10/03 08:40:11, Jose R. Santos wrote: > >>>Dec 9 14:48:04 onus kernel: nfsd: LOOKUP(3) 20: 01000001 00420051 00000002 0000a17e 00009083 00000000 file_en.46340 > >>>Dec 9 14:48:04 onus kernel: nfsd: LOOKUP(3) 20: 01000001 00420051 00000002 0000a17e 00009083 00000000 file_en.46410 I'm looking at the NFSd code and I think I'm getting a little confuse and since I'm not a NFS expert, I don't know if something like the above two lines is OK or not. Can someone impose a bit of wisdom on me. :) -JRS