From: Michael Frank <mhf@linuxmail.org>
To: Mike Fedyk <mfedyk@matchmail.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: RFC: Can swsusp 2.0 be merged into the 2.4 tree
Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2003 03:36:38 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200312120336.38918.mhf@linuxmail.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20031210215411.GC15401@matchmail.com>
On Thursday 11 December 2003 05:54, Mike Fedyk wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 11, 2003 at 05:39:07AM +0800, Michael Frank wrote:
> > swsusp is useful feature also for 2.4. Could this please be merged.
>
> Is it stable?
>
>
Yes
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-12-11 19:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-12-10 21:39 RFC: Can swsusp 2.0 be merged into the 2.4 tree Michael Frank
2003-12-10 21:54 ` Mike Fedyk
2003-12-11 19:36 ` Michael Frank [this message]
2003-12-10 21:55 ` Matt H.
2003-12-12 19:22 ` Pavel Machek
2003-12-14 4:38 ` Nigel Cunningham
2003-12-14 11:03 ` Pavel Machek
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200312120336.38918.mhf@linuxmail.org \
--to=mhf@linuxmail.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mfedyk@matchmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).