From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261929AbTLLUYD (ORCPT ); Fri, 12 Dec 2003 15:24:03 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261931AbTLLUYD (ORCPT ); Fri, 12 Dec 2003 15:24:03 -0500 Received: from gprs149-168.eurotel.cz ([160.218.149.168]:9344 "EHLO amd.ucw.cz") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261929AbTLLUYB (ORCPT ); Fri, 12 Dec 2003 15:24:01 -0500 Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2003 20:22:52 +0100 From: Pavel Machek To: Michael Frank Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: RFC: Can swsusp 2.0 be merged into the 2.4 tree Message-ID: <20031212192252.GA465@elf.ucw.cz> References: <200312110537.17496.mhf@linuxmail.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200312110537.17496.mhf@linuxmail.org> X-Warning: Reading this can be dangerous to your mental health. User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi! > swsusp is useful feature also for 2.4. Could this please be merged. 2.4 has no driver model => swsusp for 2.4 is a hack. Its nice and working, but it is still a hack. Pavel -- When do you have a heart between your knees? [Johanka's followup: and *two* hearts?]