From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262128AbTLLWcY (ORCPT ); Fri, 12 Dec 2003 17:32:24 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262108AbTLLWbv (ORCPT ); Fri, 12 Dec 2003 17:31:51 -0500 Received: from mail.jlokier.co.uk ([81.29.64.88]:31363 "EHLO mail.shareable.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262092AbTLLWb3 (ORCPT ); Fri, 12 Dec 2003 17:31:29 -0500 Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2003 22:31:28 +0000 From: Jamie Lokier To: Linux Kernel Subject: Re: Increasing HZ (patch for HZ > 1000) Message-ID: <20031212223128.GA15935@mail.shareable.org> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Grover, Andrew wrote: > I'd advocate lower HZ. Say, oh I dunno...100? This is better for power > management and also should make the sound go away. Alas, the sound my Toshiba laptop makes when the CPU is busy is the same frequency whatever kernel, and by extension whatever the timer frequency. I guess it must have another cause :/ -- Jamie