From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S263452AbTLOJzt (ORCPT ); Mon, 15 Dec 2003 04:55:49 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S263453AbTLOJzt (ORCPT ); Mon, 15 Dec 2003 04:55:49 -0500 Received: from outpost.ds9a.nl ([213.244.168.210]:46982 "EHLO outpost.ds9a.nl") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S263452AbTLOJzs (ORCPT ); Mon, 15 Dec 2003 04:55:48 -0500 Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2003 10:55:47 +0100 From: bert hubert To: Tsuchiya Yoshihiro Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: filesystem bug? Message-ID: <20031215095547.GA2279@outpost.ds9a.nl> Mail-Followup-To: bert hubert , Tsuchiya Yoshihiro , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <3FDD7DFD.7020306@labs.fujitsu.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3FDD7DFD.7020306@labs.fujitsu.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Dec 15, 2003 at 06:25:17PM +0900, Tsuchiya Yoshihiro wrote: > I use RedHat9 which kernel is 2.4.20-8 and I also tried > 2.4.20-19.9(redhat kernel patch rpm). > > I want to know whether it is a redhat kernel problem or a generic > Ext problem and on which version it is fixed. Red Hat patch their kernel so heavily it is hard to tell if this applies to stock 2.4 as well, I suggest you compile your own version and compare. If you want to be really helpful, try 2.6 too :-) Wonderful testing by the way, thanks! -- http://www.PowerDNS.com Open source, database driven DNS Software http://lartc.org Linux Advanced Routing & Traffic Control HOWTO