From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S264283AbTLPBm5 (ORCPT ); Mon, 15 Dec 2003 20:42:57 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S264292AbTLPBm5 (ORCPT ); Mon, 15 Dec 2003 20:42:57 -0500 Received: from mxsf06.cluster1.charter.net ([209.225.28.206]:774 "EHLO mxsf06.cluster1.charter.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S264283AbTLPBmz (ORCPT ); Mon, 15 Dec 2003 20:42:55 -0500 Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2003 20:40:48 -0500 To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Fixes for nforce2 hard lockup, apic, io-apic, udma133 covered Message-ID: <20031216014048.GA22988@forming> Mail-Followup-To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <200312152354.32777.ross@datscreative.com.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200312152354.32777.ross@datscreative.com.au> X-Editor: GNU Emacs 21.1 X-Operating-System: Debian GNU/Linux 2.6.0-test11-wli-2 i686 X-Uptime: 20:25:54 up 18:34, 4 users, load average: 1.72, 1.17, 1.06 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i From: Josh McKinney Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On approximately Mon, Dec 15, 2003 at 11:54:32PM +1000, Ross Dickson wrote: > > > Out of curiosity of the 10 lines with predelay count like follows > > ..APIC TIMER ack delay, predelay count: 20769 > > Do any of them exceed your safe count of 20779? and any really close > in value to the reload count of 20791? > I have an Asus A7N8X deluxe rev. 2, so no BIOS updates. I am running 2.6.0-test11-wli-2 with your(Ross Dickson) two patches that I diffed for 2.6. Default delay times, 19hrs uptime, grep tested. ..APIC TIMER ack delay, reload:25053, safe:25038 ..APIC TIMER ack delay, predelay count:24988 ..APIC TIMER ack delay, predelay count:24954 ..APIC TIMER ack delay, predelay count:25011 ..APIC TIMER ack delay, predelay count:24970 ..APIC TIMER ack delay, predelay count:25032 ..APIC TIMER ack delay, predelay count:24991 ..APIC TIMER ack delay, predelay count:24949 ..APIC TIMER ack delay, predelay count:25013 ..APIC TIMER ack delay, predelay count:24971 ..APIC TIMER ack delay, predelay count:24928 > On our pheonix bios's we regularly see 2 or 3 of them exceed the safe count > (indication of potential lockup without the patch) often with one of them > within 4 counts of the reload value (really quick). > > Can you also advise if your bios setting of the "C1 disconnect" is set to on, off, > or auto? - trying to gain a clue as to how award can have disconnect running > and avoid lockups. > athcool version 0.3.1 nVIDIA nForce2 (10de 01e0) found 'Halt Disconnect and Stop Grant Disconnect' bit is enabled. > Also are you running with DDR333 or DDR400 ram and how many sticks? > 1 stick, DDR400 Corsair, 5-2-2-2 > I have heard lockups are not supposed to happen at all if the fsb (host bus > clock speed) matches the ddr speed. One of my systems went about 4 hours > (xp2500 333fsb, DDR333) without the apic delay patch on a pheonix bios > before lockup. > I run sync memory timings and have seen pretty good uptimes without the patches. > So far it appears to be safe with a barton core cpu to read the local apic > timer count register as the v2 apic delay patch does. > I am running the barton core here, so far so good it seems. Time will only tell I guess. We are getting in the right direction I hope. > So far I cannot use my v2 apic delay patch for long periods with my throughbred > core XP2200 without hard lockups (pheonix bios, fsb266, DDR400 ram). > > Regards > Ross. > > - > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ -- Josh McKinney | Webmaster: http://joshandangie.org -------------------------------------------------------------------------- | They that can give up essential liberty Linux, the choice -o) | to obtain a little temporary safety deserve of the GNU generation /\ | neither liberty or safety. _\_v | -Benjamin Franklin