From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S266226AbUAHTiN (ORCPT ); Thu, 8 Jan 2004 14:38:13 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S266281AbUAHTiK (ORCPT ); Thu, 8 Jan 2004 14:38:10 -0500 Received: from hueytecuilhuitl.mtu.ru ([195.34.32.123]:17427 "EHLO hueymiccailhuitl.mtu.ru") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S266226AbUAHTeu (ORCPT ); Thu, 8 Jan 2004 14:34:50 -0500 From: Andrey Borzenkov To: Alex Goddard , Ian Kent Subject: Re: udev and devfs - The final word Date: Thu, 8 Jan 2004 22:22:06 +0300 User-Agent: KMail/1.5.3 Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200401082222.06800.arvidjaar@mail.ru> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thursday 08 January 2004 21:14, Alex Goddard wrote: > On Thu, 8 Jan 2004, Ian Kent wrote: > > On Thu, 8 Jan 2004, [koi8-r] "Andrey Borzenkov[koi8-r] " wrote: > > [Snip] > > > > I do care. Searching archives for devfs mostly brings "everyone knows > > > this is crap". That is why I kindly ask you to show real evidence that > > > the problems it has are unsolvable. > > > > Again I'm also unable to find descriptions of the 'unsolvable' races. > > > > I wouldn't mind knowing what they are either. Anyone? > > Can no one think of good search terms for these sorts of things these > days? From the first and only page hmm ... that does not sound like "tons of" as someone else mentioned does it? > of results for 'devfs unsolvable > races': > > http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-kernel&m=105851630726585&w=2 oh, that same again ... you are beating dead horse. See reply to another similar post. thank you -andrey