From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S265442AbUAJVti (ORCPT ); Sat, 10 Jan 2004 16:49:38 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S265443AbUAJVti (ORCPT ); Sat, 10 Jan 2004 16:49:38 -0500 Received: from waste.org ([209.173.204.2]:32659 "EHLO waste.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S265442AbUAJVtg (ORCPT ); Sat, 10 Jan 2004 16:49:36 -0500 Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2004 15:49:30 -0600 From: Matt Mackall To: "Eric W. Biederman" Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: 2.6.1-rc1-tiny1 tree for small systems Message-ID: <20040110214930.GM18208@waste.org> References: <20040103030814.GG18208@waste.org> <20040104084005.GU18208@waste.org> <20040105170938.GY18208@waste.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Jan 08, 2004 at 12:22:29PM -0700, Eric W. Biederman wrote: > Matt Mackall writes: > > > On Sun, Jan 04, 2004 at 05:00:49PM -0700, Eric W. Biederman wrote: > > > On the side of useless ugly. But interesting in what I had to touch > > > the following patch is a first crude stab at removing block device > > > support from the kernel. > > > > This looks good. If you can send me a version with > > /BLOCK_DEVICE/BLOCK/, etc., I'll put it in. > > Ok. I have just had a chance to clean some things up. Attached > is my latest and hopefully clean set up diffs against 2.6.1-rc1-tiny1 > > I am bouncing this off of linux-kernel as well since I got such good > feedback last time. > > - First the compile fixes, so I can compile test this code. Ok, had this stuff in my last release. > - Then the CONFIG_BLOCK patch. Merged with some minor tweaks in 2.6.1-tiny1. > - Then a new patch that was sort of in my tree to make BINFMT_SCRIPT > configurable. Merged. > - And another new patch to use cond_syscall instead of explicit > dummies when we don't have the AIO code compiled in. I went back and cleaned up all my syscall changes to use the cond_syscall approach, thanks for pointing it out. -- Matt Mackall : http://www.selenic.com : Linux development and consulting