From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S265641AbUAMVO4 (ORCPT ); Tue, 13 Jan 2004 16:14:56 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S265649AbUAMVO4 (ORCPT ); Tue, 13 Jan 2004 16:14:56 -0500 Received: from [65.248.109.87] ([65.248.109.87]:12749 "EHLO ns1.brianandsara.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S265641AbUAMVOv (ORCPT ); Tue, 13 Jan 2004 16:14:51 -0500 From: Brian Jackson Organization: Gentoo Linux To: Dave Jones , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: athlon-xp header issue Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 15:14:58 -0600 User-Agent: KMail/1.5.94 References: <398633829.20040113113000@netdork.net> <20040113191217.GA29400@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <20040113191217.GA29400@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200401131514.58205.iggy@gentoo.org> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tuesday 13 January 2004 01:12 pm, Dave Jones wrote: > On Tue, Jan 13, 2004 at 11:30:00AM -0600, Jonathan Angliss wrote: > > This gave me a hint. So I took a look in arch/i386/config.in and > > noticed that the check for CONFIG_MK7XP is missing. This results in > > the appropriate settings not being set. Is this intentional? Or am I > > looking in the wrong area for my problem? > > CONFIG_MK7XP is a gentoo specific bogon. Bug them about it. > (For info on why its bogus, search the linux-kernel archives, > as it comes up every few months.) Are you referring to the fact that Gentoo's kernel is a steamy pile, or the fact that the extra athlon-xp stuff is pointless? --Iggy > > Dave >