From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262851AbUCOXs3 (ORCPT ); Mon, 15 Mar 2004 18:48:29 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262852AbUCOXs3 (ORCPT ); Mon, 15 Mar 2004 18:48:29 -0500 Received: from phoenix.infradead.org ([213.86.99.234]:56332 "EHLO phoenix.infradead.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262851AbUCOXs2 (ORCPT ); Mon, 15 Mar 2004 18:48:28 -0500 Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2004 23:48:26 +0000 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Johannes Erdfelt Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: PATCH - InfiniBand Access Layer (IBAL) Message-ID: <20040315234826.A24238@infradead.org> Mail-Followup-To: Christoph Hellwig , Johannes Erdfelt , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <1AC79F16F5C5284499BB9591B33D6F000B4805@orsmsx408.jf.intel.com> <20040315231705.A23888@infradead.org> <20040315234425.GD30801@sventech.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i In-Reply-To: <20040315234425.GD30801@sventech.com>; from johannes@erdfelt.com on Mon, Mar 15, 2004 at 03:44:25PM -0800 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Mar 15, 2004 at 03:44:25PM -0800, Johannes Erdfelt wrote: > > From looking at both codebases starting from scratch sounds like the > > best idea to me.. > > What's fatally wrong with the code that's currently available via > openib.org? Did you actually read it? p.s. if you reply to my mails please keep me in the To line. Really, please don't do any fany reply to group tricks unless people explicitly request it in the Mail-Fup header.