From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S263885AbUDFQGR (ORCPT ); Tue, 6 Apr 2004 12:06:17 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S263891AbUDFQCd (ORCPT ); Tue, 6 Apr 2004 12:02:33 -0400 Received: from ppp-217-133-42-200.cust-adsl.tiscali.it ([217.133.42.200]:42884 "EHLO dualathlon.random") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S263889AbUDFQBn (ORCPT ); Tue, 6 Apr 2004 12:01:43 -0400 Date: Tue, 6 Apr 2004 18:01:41 +0200 From: Andrea Arcangeli To: Christoph Hellwig , Andrew Morton , hugh@veritas.com, vrajesh@umich.edu, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 1/3] radix priority search tree - objrmap complexity fix Message-ID: <20040406160141.GX2234@dualathlon.random> References: <20040402205410.A7194@infradead.org> <20040402203514.GR21341@dualathlon.random> <20040403094058.A13091@infradead.org> <20040403152026.GE2307@dualathlon.random> <20040403155958.GF2307@dualathlon.random> <20040403170258.GH2307@dualathlon.random> <20040405105912.A3896@infradead.org> <20040405131113.A5094@infradead.org> <20040406042222.GP2234@dualathlon.random> <20040406061646.B14800@infradead.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040406061646.B14800@infradead.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i X-GPG-Key: 1024D/68B9CB43 13D9 8355 295F 4823 7C49 C012 DFA1 686E 68B9 CB43 X-PGP-Key: 1024R/CB4660B9 CC A0 71 81 F4 A0 63 AC C0 4B 81 1D 8C 15 C8 E5 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Apr 06, 2004 at 06:16:46AM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > Can you try the patch below (testing it now, but I'm pretty sure it'll fix it) > instead of all the kmalloc changes?: I'm having some email dealy so I don't know if you sent me more recent emails, did it work fine as expected or should I keep my kmalloc change? thanks