From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S263696AbUDGOq7 (ORCPT ); Wed, 7 Apr 2004 10:46:59 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S263697AbUDGOq7 (ORCPT ); Wed, 7 Apr 2004 10:46:59 -0400 Received: from mtvcafw.sgi.com ([192.48.171.6]:33158 "EHLO omx2.sgi.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S263696AbUDGOqa (ORCPT ); Wed, 7 Apr 2004 10:46:30 -0400 Date: Wed, 7 Apr 2004 07:44:41 -0700 From: Paul Jackson To: Nick Piggin Cc: vda@port.imtp.ilyichevsk.odessa.ua, colpatch@us.ibm.com, wli@holomorphy.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [Patch 17/23] mask v2 = [6/7] nodemask_t_ia64_changes Message-Id: <20040407074441.5070b58d.pj@sgi.com> In-Reply-To: <40740C90.3060005@yahoo.com.au> References: <20040401122802.23521599.pj@sgi.com> <20040401131240.00f7d74d.pj@sgi.com> <20040406043732.6fb2df9f.pj@sgi.com> <200404070855.03742.vda@port.imtp.ilyichevsk.odessa.ua> <20040406235000.6c06af9a.pj@sgi.com> <20040407004437.3a078f28.pj@sgi.com> <40740C90.3060005@yahoo.com.au> Organization: SGI X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.8.10claws (GTK+ 1.2.10; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Nick wrote: > No, the schedule() fastpath doesn't use find_next_bit. Ok - makes sense - thanks. Uninlining it is perhaps the easiest way out. That or replacing it with the trivial version that is several times smaller (loops one bit at a time, checking 'test_bit()'). Right now, I don't see any excuse for that fat version of find_next_bit() to exist. -- I won't rest till it's the best ... Programmer, Linux Scalability Paul Jackson 1.650.933.1373