From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262528AbUDOLtE (ORCPT ); Thu, 15 Apr 2004 07:49:04 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262648AbUDOLtE (ORCPT ); Thu, 15 Apr 2004 07:49:04 -0400 Received: from cfcafw.sgi.com ([198.149.23.1]:10246 "EHLO omx1.americas.sgi.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262528AbUDOLtC (ORCPT ); Thu, 15 Apr 2004 07:49:02 -0400 Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2004 06:48:17 -0500 From: Robin Holt To: Andi Kleen Cc: colpatch@us.ibm.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, akpm@osdl.org, mbligh@aracnet.com Subject: Re: NUMA API for Linux Message-ID: <20040415114817.GB20441@lnx-holt.americas.sgi.com> References: <1081373058.9061.16.camel@arrakis> <20040407232712.2595ac16.ak@suse.de> <1081989517.1206.206.camel@arrakis> <20040415123915.016523df.ak@suse.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040415123915.016523df.ak@suse.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Apr 15, 2004 at 12:39:15PM +0200, Andi Kleen wrote: > On Wed, 14 Apr 2004 17:38:37 -0700 > Matthew Dobson wrote: > > 2) Rename check_* to mpol_check_* > > I really don't understand why you insist on renaming all my functions? > I like the current naming, thank you. > I like the mpol_ flavors because there is no namespace collision on these. When I look at cscope or any other code analysis tool, I know that the mpol_... functions belong together. Makes investigating other people's code easier. Just my 2 cents, Robin Holt