From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261290AbUKSH5k (ORCPT ); Fri, 19 Nov 2004 02:57:40 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261292AbUKSH5k (ORCPT ); Fri, 19 Nov 2004 02:57:40 -0500 Received: from holomorphy.com ([207.189.100.168]:34186 "EHLO holomorphy.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261290AbUKSH5i (ORCPT ); Fri, 19 Nov 2004 02:57:38 -0500 Date: Thu, 18 Nov 2004 23:57:32 -0800 From: William Lee Irwin III To: Andrew Morton Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: 2.6.10-rc2-mm1 Message-ID: <20041119075732.GO2268@holomorphy.com> References: <20041116014213.2128aca9.akpm@osdl.org> <20041117113225.GP3217@holomorphy.com> <20041117123401.GQ3217@holomorphy.com> <20041117125624.GR3217@holomorphy.com> <20041118102210.GB3217@holomorphy.com> <20041118023123.4365de41.akpm@osdl.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20041118023123.4365de41.akpm@osdl.org> Organization: The Domain of Holomorphy User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040722i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org William Lee Irwin III wrote: >> sparc64 broke between 2.6.9 and 2.6.10-rc1. Are there any split-up >> diffs of what went on between 2.6.9 and 2.6.10-rc1? On Thu, Nov 18, 2004 at 02:31:23AM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote: > That'll be hard to do, because 2.6.9->2.6.10-rc1 was one of those brief > periods of frenetic patchbombing. > You could try 2.6.9-rc4-mm1 and if the bug is there, try 2.6.9-rc4-mm1's > linus.patch and if the bug is not there, iterate though 2.6.9-rc4-mm1's > patches. > If the bug isn't in 2.6.9-rc4-mm1 I guess you're down to a binary search > with `bk clone'. It might be a bit easier with bkcvs actually. I got it narrowed down to the exact patch and bad interaction, then davem spotted the right thing to do instantly, so this one's closed. -- wli