From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261197AbUKUOsy (ORCPT ); Sun, 21 Nov 2004 09:48:54 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261199AbUKUOsy (ORCPT ); Sun, 21 Nov 2004 09:48:54 -0500 Received: from pop.gmx.net ([213.165.64.20]:57792 "HELO mail.gmx.net") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S261197AbUKUOsw (ORCPT ); Sun, 21 Nov 2004 09:48:52 -0500 X-Authenticated: #4399952 Date: Sun, 21 Nov 2004 15:49:44 +0100 From: Florian Schmidt To: Ingo Molnar Cc: Lee Revell , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Rui Nuno Capela , Mark_H_Johnson@Raytheon.com, "K.R. Foley" , Bill Huey , Adam Heath , Thomas Gleixner , Michal Schmidt , Fernando Pablo Lopez-Lezcano , Karsten Wiese , Gunther Persoons , emann@mrv.com, Shane Shrybman , Amit Shah Subject: Re: [patch] Real-Time Preemption, -RT-2.6.10-rc2-mm2-V0.7.29-0 Message-ID: <20041121154944.29a0b5ff@mango.fruits.de> In-Reply-To: <20041121124555.GA7972@elte.hu> References: <20041117124234.GA25956@elte.hu> <20041118123521.GA29091@elte.hu> <20041118164612.GA17040@elte.hu> <1100920963.1424.1.camel@krustophenia.net> <20041120125536.GC8091@elte.hu> <1100971141.6879.18.camel@krustophenia.net> <20041120191403.GA16262@elte.hu> <1100975745.6879.35.camel@krustophenia.net> <20041120201155.6dc43c39@mango.fruits.de> <20041120214035.2deceaeb@mango.fruits.de> <20041121124555.GA7972@elte.hu> X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 0.9.12b (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sun, 21 Nov 2004 13:45:55 +0100 Ingo Molnar wrote: > > * Florian Schmidt wrote: > > > > Will build 29-4 PREEMPT_REALTIME now and see how this one behaves. > > > > Pretty much as bad as 29-1. Sadly i have no idea on how to find out > > what is causing jackd to act so weird under a PREEMPT_REALTIME kernel. > > It seems there is some correlation to activity on X. Hiding and > > showing windows has a certain chance of triggering a large xrun. > > do you have chrt-ed the IRQ#0 thread and the soundcard thread as well? yes. I tried the following combinations with PREEMPT_RT: - IRQ 0 prio 40, IRQ 3 (soundcard) prio 98 - IRQ 0 prio 99, IRQ 3 prio 98 all other IRQ's at prios around 40-50 (default or set explicitly to 40). What is the recommended setting for IRQ 0? I thought in this typical thread-wakeup-by-IRQ scenario the scheduler is "shorted" anyways when an IRQ occurs, so IRQ 0's prio shouldn't really matter. flo