From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner+willy=40w.ods.org-S262386AbUKZVFg@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S262386AbUKZVFg (ORCPT <rfc822;willy@w.ods.org>);
	Fri, 26 Nov 2004 16:05:36 -0500
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S264125AbUKZVEr
	(ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel-outgoing>);
	Fri, 26 Nov 2004 16:04:47 -0500
Received: from [213.146.154.40] ([213.146.154.40]:43417 "EHLO
	pentafluge.infradead.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S262386AbUKZVAe (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Fri, 26 Nov 2004 16:00:34 -0500
Date: Fri, 26 Nov 2004 21:00:31 +0000
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
To: Nigel Cunningham <ncunningham@linuxmail.org>
Cc: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>, Andrew Morton <akpm@digeo.com>,
       Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Suspend 2 merge: 21/51: Refrigerator upgrade.
Message-ID: <20041126210031.GA14317@infradead.org>
Mail-Followup-To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
	Nigel Cunningham <ncunningham@linuxmail.org>,
	Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>, Andrew Morton <akpm@digeo.com>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
References: <1101292194.5805.180.camel@desktop.cunninghams> <1101296026.5805.275.camel@desktop.cunninghams> <20041125183332.GJ1417@openzaurus.ucw.cz> <1101420616.27250.65.camel@desktop.cunninghams>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <1101420616.27250.65.camel@desktop.cunninghams>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i
X-SRS-Rewrite: SMTP reverse-path rewritten from <hch@infradead.org> by pentafluge.infradead.org
	See http://www.infradead.org/rpr.html
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

> I'm hoping to get the whole thing in mm once all these replies are dealt
> with. Does that sound unrealistic?

Yes.  Absolutely.