From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261598AbULIUF7 (ORCPT ); Thu, 9 Dec 2004 15:05:59 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261599AbULIUF7 (ORCPT ); Thu, 9 Dec 2004 15:05:59 -0500 Received: from mx1.elte.hu ([157.181.1.137]:48875 "EHLO mx1.elte.hu") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261598AbULIUFy (ORCPT ); Thu, 9 Dec 2004 15:05:54 -0500 Date: Thu, 9 Dec 2004 21:04:35 +0100 From: Ingo Molnar To: Mark_H_Johnson@raytheon.com Cc: Amit Shah , Karsten Wiese , Bill Huey , Adam Heath , emann@mrv.com, Gunther Persoons , "K.R. Foley" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Florian Schmidt , Fernando Pablo Lopez-Lezcano , Lee Revell , Rui Nuno Capela , Shane Shrybman , Esben Nielsen , Thomas Gleixner , Michal Schmidt Subject: Re: [patch] Real-Time Preemption, -RT-2.6.10-rc2-mm3-V0.7.32-6 Message-ID: <20041209200435.GA14194@elte.hu> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i X-ELTE-SpamVersion: MailScanner 4.31.6-itk1 (ELTE 1.2) SpamAssassin 2.63 ClamAV 0.73 X-ELTE-VirusStatus: clean X-ELTE-SpamCheck: no X-ELTE-SpamCheck-Details: score=-2.201, required 5.9, BAYES_00 -4.90, SORTED_RECIPS 2.70 X-ELTE-SpamLevel: X-ELTE-SpamScore: -2 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org * Mark_H_Johnson@raytheon.com wrote: > I don't expect turning the debugging off will make that much of a > difference but I can try it tomorrow. [...] so basically this is your setup: - prio 99: all IRQ threads and ksoftirqd threads - prio 30: 'CPU loop' from latencytest, generating ~80% CPU load - SCHED_OTHER: workload generators and the metric is "delays in the prio 30 CPU loop", correct? Ingo