From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261705AbULNWdP (ORCPT ); Tue, 14 Dec 2004 17:33:15 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261693AbULNWdG (ORCPT ); Tue, 14 Dec 2004 17:33:06 -0500 Received: from mx1.elte.hu ([157.181.1.137]:36247 "EHLO mx1.elte.hu") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261668AbULNW2Q (ORCPT ); Tue, 14 Dec 2004 17:28:16 -0500 Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2004 23:28:04 +0100 From: Ingo Molnar To: George Anzinger Cc: Steven Rostedt , Lee Revell , LKML , Rui Nuno Capela , Mark Johnson , "K.R. Foley" , Bill Huey , Adam Heath , Florian Schmidt , Thomas Gleixner , Fernando Pablo Lopez-Lezcano Subject: Re: [patch] Real-Time Preemption, -RT-2.6.10-rc3-mm1-V0.7.33-0 Message-ID: <20041214222804.GC22043@elte.hu> References: <20041124101626.GA31788@elte.hu> <20041203205807.GA25578@elte.hu> <20041207132927.GA4846@elte.hu> <20041207141123.GA12025@elte.hu> <20041214132834.GA32390@elte.hu> <1103052853.3582.46.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1103054908.14699.20.camel@krustophenia.net> <1103057144.3582.51.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20041214211828.GA17216@elte.hu> <41BF60A1.1080606@mvista.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <41BF60A1.1080606@mvista.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i X-ELTE-SpamVersion: MailScanner 4.31.6-itk1 (ELTE 1.2) SpamAssassin 2.63 ClamAV 0.73 X-ELTE-VirusStatus: clean X-ELTE-SpamCheck: no X-ELTE-SpamCheck-Details: score=-4.9, required 5.9, autolearn=not spam, BAYES_00 -4.90 X-ELTE-SpamLevel: X-ELTE-SpamScore: -4 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org * George Anzinger wrote: > >the two projects are obviously complementary and i have no intention to > >reinvent the wheel in any way. Best would be to bring hires timers up to > >upstream-mergable state (independently of the -RT patch) and ask Andrew > >to include it in -mm, then i'd port -RT to it automatically. > > Well, I guess I am just backward :) I plan to port it to the current > RT today or tomorrow (if all goes well). I will then work on the > changes needed to get it into -mm. Guess I will be supporting two > versions for a bit... very good - i can carry it along in -RT, and your VST bits are certainly an immediate bonus feature for the non-hard-RT (=laptop, desktop, audio) folks too. Ingo