From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262236AbULQX7z (ORCPT ); Fri, 17 Dec 2004 18:59:55 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262238AbULQX7y (ORCPT ); Fri, 17 Dec 2004 18:59:54 -0500 Received: from 82-43-72-5.cable.ubr06.croy.blueyonder.co.uk ([82.43.72.5]:9713 "EHLO home.chandlerfamily.org.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262236AbULQX7l (ORCPT ); Fri, 17 Dec 2004 18:59:41 -0500 From: Alan Chandler To: Bill Davidsen Subject: Re: ide-cd problem revisited - more brainpower needed Date: Fri, 17 Dec 2004 23:59:39 +0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.7.1 Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Alan Cox , Jens Axboe References: <200412121334.55460.alan@chandlerfamily.org.uk> <200412140020.18114.alan@chandlerfamily.org.uk> <41C1B018.2090903@tmr.com> In-Reply-To: <41C1B018.2090903@tmr.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200412172359.40037.alan@chandlerfamily.org.uk> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thursday 16 December 2004 15:56, Bill Davidsen wrote: > > Is it? Or did the firmware "upgrade" make it worse? Can you reflash back > to the original firmware and see if 2.4 works correctly? Unfortunately not - the version I 'upgraded' from was not on their web site, so I don't have a way back. I was a thought that crossed my mind, although the detailed problem of multiple interrupts after apparently successfully completing the 0x3c command still occurred in exactly the same way and place when using 2.6.10-rc3. -- Alan Chandler alan@chandlerfamily.org.uk First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win. --Gandhi