linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Barry K. Nathan" <barryn@pobox.com>
To: Matthew Garrett <mgarrett@chiark.greenend.org.uk>
Cc: John M Flinchbaugh <john@hjsoft.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, pavel@ucw.cz
Subject: Re: 2.6.10: e100 network broken after swsusp/resume
Date: Sat, 1 Jan 2005 19:46:06 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050102034606.GA7406@ip68-4-98-123.oc.oc.cox.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <E1CksSX-0003Ki-00@chiark.greenend.org.uk>

On Sat, Jan 01, 2005 at 11:14:57PM +0000, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> Does pci=routeirq make any difference?

I'm not the original poster, and I haven't read this whole thread yet,
but I may have some useful input...

I think I'm seeing this problem (with the same symptoms) with both e100
and 8139too, on two different machines. It started with 2.6.10-rc1-bk24;
bk23 works fine.

I haven't tested my e100 system (laptop) as thoroughly as my 8139too system
(desktop), but this is what I'm seeing with 8139too:

Adding pci=routeirq makes the problem go away. Using acpi=off *instead* of
pci=routeirq also makes the problem go away. If I use "noapic" instead
of acpi=off or pci=routeirq, I get a different variant of the problem:
Almost immediately after resume, there's a kernel log message that the
NIC's interrupt has been disabled (I forget the exact wording). Checking
/proc/interrupts shows that the NIC's interrupt (which is not shared
with any other devices) has shot up to 100000 interrupts. (This
phenomenon does not happen if I do not specify noapic.)

Now I'll go and read the rest of this thread. If there's any more
information I need to provide or anything else I need to try, let me
know.

-Barry K. Nathan <barryn@pobox.com>


  reply	other threads:[~2005-01-02  3:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-12-28 14:47 2.6.10: e100 network broken after swsusp/resume John M Flinchbaugh
2004-12-28 21:25 ` Håkan Lindqvist
2005-01-01 23:41   ` Eduard Bloch
2005-01-01 17:23 ` Pavel Machek
2005-01-01 22:17   ` John M Flinchbaugh
2005-01-01 22:52     ` Pavel Machek
2005-01-01 23:14     ` Matthew Garrett
2005-01-02  3:46       ` Barry K. Nathan [this message]
2005-01-02  5:57   ` Barry K. Nathan
2005-01-02 18:42     ` John M Flinchbaugh
2005-01-02 20:09       ` Håkan Lindqvist
2005-01-03  5:10         ` Barry K. Nathan
2005-01-03  8:31           ` Barry K. Nathan
2005-01-03  8:53             ` Pavel Machek
2005-01-03  8:47           ` Pavel Machek
2005-01-03 10:14             ` Barry K. Nathan
2005-01-03 15:05               ` [PATCH] swsusp: properly suspend and resume *all* devices Barry K. Nathan
2005-01-03 17:08                 ` Pavel Machek
2005-01-03 18:33                   ` Pavel Machek
2005-01-04  5:15                     ` Barry K. Nathan
2005-01-04  5:18                       ` Barry K. Nathan
2005-01-04  8:44                 ` Martin Lucina
2005-01-04 10:30                   ` 2.6.10 suspend/resume bustage (was Re: [PATCH] swsusp: properly suspend and resume *all* devices) Martin Lucina
2005-01-04 21:43                   ` [PATCH] swsusp: properly suspend and resume *all* devices Pavel Machek
2005-01-05 15:57                     ` Lion Vollnhals
2005-01-06 22:29                       ` Pavel Machek
2005-01-07 13:47                         ` Takashi Iwai
2005-01-07 13:54                           ` Pavel Machek
2005-01-07 14:48                             ` Dmitry Torokhov
2005-01-07 15:35                             ` Vojtech Pavlik
2005-01-07 15:59                         ` Lion Vollnhals

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20050102034606.GA7406@ip68-4-98-123.oc.oc.cox.net \
    --to=barryn@pobox.com \
    --cc=john@hjsoft.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mgarrett@chiark.greenend.org.uk \
    --cc=pavel@ucw.cz \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).