From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262042AbVADFTA (ORCPT ); Tue, 4 Jan 2005 00:19:00 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262037AbVADFTA (ORCPT ); Tue, 4 Jan 2005 00:19:00 -0500 Received: from orb.pobox.com ([207.8.226.5]:8166 "EHLO orb.pobox.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262092AbVADFSs (ORCPT ); Tue, 4 Jan 2005 00:18:48 -0500 Date: Mon, 3 Jan 2005 21:18:39 -0800 From: "Barry K. Nathan" To: "Barry K. Nathan" Cc: Pavel Machek , lindqvist@netstar.se, edi@gmx.de, john@hjsoft.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, akpm@osdl.org, torvalds@osdl.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] swsusp: properly suspend and resume *all* devices Message-ID: <20050104051839.GB4465@ip68-4-98-123.oc.oc.cox.net> References: <20050102055753.GB7406@ip68-4-98-123.oc.oc.cox.net> <20050102184239.GA21322@butterfly.hjsoft.com> <1104696556.2478.12.camel@pefyra> <20050103051018.GA4413@ip68-4-98-123.oc.oc.cox.net> <20050103084713.GB2099@elf.ucw.cz> <20050103101423.GA4441@ip68-4-98-123.oc.oc.cox.net> <20050103150505.GA4120@ip68-4-98-123.oc.oc.cox.net> <20050103170807.GA8163@elf.ucw.cz> <20050103183317.GA1353@elf.ucw.cz> <20050104051529.GA4465@ip68-4-98-123.oc.oc.cox.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20050104051529.GA4465@ip68-4-98-123.oc.oc.cox.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Jan 03, 2005 at 09:15:30PM -0800, Barry K. Nathan wrote: > Hmmm... I'm not sure how necessary it is, and I think it slows down > resume a tiny bit. However, the more I think about it the more correct it > seems, so here's the follow-up patch. (Andrew, even if this patch is > rejected, please commit my first one to the next -mm release. That patch > alone is still an improvement over the current code.) Ugh. I forgot to mention in my previous mail that the patch is against 2.6.10-mm1 + my previous patch (perhaps that was obvious), and that I've lightly tested the patch (that probably wasn't obvious, to say the least). -Barry K. Nathan