From: Andi Kleen <ak@muc.de>
To: William Lee Irwin III <wli@holomorphy.com>
Cc: colin@coesta.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Max CPUs on x86_64 under 2.6.x
Date: 4 Jan 2005 12:09:40 +0100
Date: Tue, 4 Jan 2005 12:09:40 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050104110940.GA32022@muc.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20050104022034.GB2708@holomorphy.com>
On Mon, Jan 03, 2005 at 06:20:34PM -0800, William Lee Irwin III wrote:
> "Colin Coe" <colin@coesta.com> writes:
> >> Why is the number of CPUs on the x86_64 architecture only 8 but under i386
> >> it is 255?
> >> I've searched the list archives and Google but can't find an answer.
>
> On Tue, Jan 04, 2005 at 01:34:50AM +0100, Andi Kleen wrote:
> > Post 2.6.10 x86-64 will support more CPUs. 2.6.10 actually does too,
> > but the Kconfig hadn't been changed then. Previously there was an
> > 8 CPU APIC driver limit, however it turned out later that it doesn't
> > apply to some Opteron machines.
>
> Barring cpus with a different onboard interrupt controller from the
> xAPIC or the use of external interrupt controllers to assist with cpu
> addressing, 255 serves as an architectural limit for Opteron as well.
Yes, 255 is the limit, but not 8. Opteron can enable a special flat
mode that allows flat APIC addressing upto 255. I assume the BIOS
will set that bit on machines with that many CPUs.
I recently audited the flat APIC code and I think it should work without
changes to 255 CPUs, but I wasn't able to test it so far.
However 2.6.10 supports clustered mode now anyways, so you could
probably use more CPUs given the right x86-64 IBM machine. I don't
know if that has been tested so far.
The change to extend NR_CPUs and the max number of nodes just went into
Linus' tree, you would need a recent bk snapshot.
http://linux.bkbits.net:8080/linux-2.6/cset@41da1ff62QYI89HDgrcKwnBAz6wgQg?nav=index.html|ChangeSet@-1d
-Andi
prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-01-04 11:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-01-03 14:00 Max CPUs on x86_64 under 2.6.x Colin Coe
2005-01-03 22:15 ` William Lee Irwin III
2005-01-04 0:17 ` Colin Coe
2005-01-04 2:12 ` William Lee Irwin III
2005-01-04 0:34 ` Andi Kleen
2005-01-04 2:20 ` William Lee Irwin III
2005-01-04 11:09 ` Andi Kleen [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20050104110940.GA32022@muc.de \
--to=ak@muc.de \
--cc=colin@coesta.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=wli@holomorphy.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).