From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261841AbVADVMg (ORCPT ); Tue, 4 Jan 2005 16:12:36 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262065AbVADVKD (ORCPT ); Tue, 4 Jan 2005 16:10:03 -0500 Received: from grendel.digitalservice.pl ([217.67.200.140]:15536 "HELO mail.digitalservice.pl") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S261841AbVADVFb (ORCPT ); Tue, 4 Jan 2005 16:05:31 -0500 From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" To: Andi Kleen Subject: Re: 2.6.10-mm1 [failure on AMD64] Date: Tue, 4 Jan 2005 22:05:48 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.7.1 Cc: Christoph Hellwig , Jesse Barnes , David Howells , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <20050103011113.6f6c8f44.akpm@osdl.org> <200501040029.15623.rjw@sisk.pl> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-2" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200501042205.49302.rjw@sisk.pl> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tuesday, 4 of January 2005 13:22, Andi Kleen wrote: > "Rafael J. Wysocki" writes: > > > On Monday, 3 of January 2005 18:19, Jesse Barnes wrote: > >> On Monday, January 3, 2005 2:07 am, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > >> > > add-page-becoming-writable-notification.patch > >> > > Add page becoming writable notification > >> > > >> > David, this still has the bogus address_space operation in addition to > >> > the vm_operation. page_mkwrite only fits into the vm_operations scheme, > >> > so please remove the address_space op. Also the code will be smaller > >> > and faster witout that indirection.. > >> > >> And apparently it's broken on NUMA. I couldn't find > >> generic_file_get/set_policy in my tree, which builds with CONFIG_NUMA > >> enabled. > > > > On a dual-Opteron w/ NUMA I had to apply the Jesse's patch to compile the > > kernel, but it does not boot. It only prints this to the serial console: > > I suspect it is fixed by Bill Irwin's patch from the > "[bootfix] pass used_node_mask by reference .." thread. Can you test that? Sure. It fixes the problem. Greets, RJW -- - Would you tell me, please, which way I ought to go from here? - That depends a good deal on where you want to get to. -- Lewis Carroll "Alice's Adventures in Wonderland"