From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262887AbVAFPdp (ORCPT ); Thu, 6 Jan 2005 10:33:45 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262886AbVAFPcu (ORCPT ); Thu, 6 Jan 2005 10:32:50 -0500 Received: from [213.146.154.40] ([213.146.154.40]:3752 "EHLO pentafluge.infradead.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262861AbVAFPbx (ORCPT ); Thu, 6 Jan 2005 10:31:53 -0500 Date: Thu, 6 Jan 2005 15:31:47 +0000 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Lee Revell Cc: Andi Kleen , "Michael S. Tsirkin" , Andrew Morton , Takashi Iwai , mingo@elte.hu, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, pavel@suse.cz, discuss@x86-64.org, gordon.jin@intel.com, greg@kroah.com, VANDROVE@vc.cvut.cz Subject: Re: [PATCH] macros to detect existance of unlocked_ioctl and ioctl_compat Message-ID: <20050106153147.GB19324@infradead.org> Mail-Followup-To: Christoph Hellwig , Lee Revell , Andi Kleen , "Michael S. Tsirkin" , Andrew Morton , Takashi Iwai , mingo@elte.hu, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, pavel@suse.cz, discuss@x86-64.org, gordon.jin@intel.com, greg@kroah.com, VANDROVE@vc.cvut.cz References: <20041217014345.GA11926@mellanox.co.il> <20050103011113.6f6c8f44.akpm@osdl.org> <20050105144043.GB19434@mellanox.co.il> <20050105133448.59345b04.akpm@osdl.org> <20050106140636.GE25629@mellanox.co.il> <20050106145356.GA18725@infradead.org> <20050106150941.GE1830@wotan.suse.de> <20050106151429.GA19155@infradead.org> <1105024942.13396.4.camel@krustophenia.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="d6Gm4EdcadzBjdND" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1105024942.13396.4.camel@krustophenia.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i X-SRS-Rewrite: SMTP reverse-path rewritten from by pentafluge.infradead.org See http://www.infradead.org/rpr.html Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org --d6Gm4EdcadzBjdND Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Thu, Jan 06, 2005 at 10:22:21AM -0500, Lee Revell wrote: > > p.s. droppe alsa-devel from Cc because of the braindead moderation policy. > > > > Um, alsa-devel is not moderated, we accept posts from non subscribers. > Where do you think all the spam in our archive comes from? See the attached mail I got. Btw, where are the current alsa-devel archives? I tried to look things up a few times lately, but all archives linked off the websiste are either dead or totally outdated. --d6Gm4EdcadzBjdND Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=alsa-mod >>From alsa-devel-admin@lists.sourceforge.net Thu Jan 06 14:56:18 2005 Return-path: Envelope-to: hch@infradead.org Delivery-date: Thu, 06 Jan 2005 14:56:18 +0000 Received: from mx-outbound.sourceforge.net ([66.35.250.223]) by pentafluge.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.42 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1CmZ3h-0004tZ-A6 for hch@infradead.org; Thu, 06 Jan 2005 14:56:18 +0000 Received: from projects.sourceforge.net (sc8-sf-list2-b.sourceforge.net [10.3.1.8]) by sc8-sf-spam1.sourceforge.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 553EB88F8E for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 06:56:06 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2005 06:56:06 -0800 Subject: Your message to Alsa-devel awaits moderator approval From: alsa-devel-admin@lists.sourceforge.net To: hch@infradead.org X-Ack: no Sender: alsa-devel-admin@lists.sourceforge.net Errors-To: alsa-devel-admin@lists.sourceforge.net X-BeenThere: alsa-devel@lists.sourceforge.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.9-sf.net Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: , List-Id: Advanced Linux Sound Architecture - Devel List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Archive: Message-Id: <20050106145606.553EB88F8E@sc8-sf-spam1.sourceforge.net> X-Spam-Score: 0.3 (/) X-Spam-Report: SpamAssassin version 2.63 on pentafluge.infradead.org summary: Content analysis details: (0.3 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.3 NO_REAL_NAME From: does not include a real name Status: RO Content-Length: 351 Lines: 12 Your mail to 'Alsa-devel' with the subject Re: [PATCH] deprecate (un)register_ioctl32_conversion Is being held until the list moderator can review it for approval. The reason it is being held: Too many recipients to the message Either the message will get posted to the list, or you will receive notification of the moderator's decision. --d6Gm4EdcadzBjdND--