From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261265AbVAGBWN (ORCPT ); Thu, 6 Jan 2005 20:22:13 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261271AbVAGBWH (ORCPT ); Thu, 6 Jan 2005 20:22:07 -0500 Received: from fw.osdl.org ([65.172.181.6]:53913 "EHLO mail.osdl.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261270AbVAGBVu (ORCPT ); Thu, 6 Jan 2005 20:21:50 -0500 Date: Thu, 6 Jan 2005 17:26:24 -0800 From: Andrew Morton To: Jesper Juhl Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH][0/4] let's kill verify_area Message-Id: <20050106172624.7cc2a142.akpm@osdl.org> In-Reply-To: References: X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.7 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i586-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Jesper Juhl wrote: > > verify_area() if just a wrapper for access_ok() (or similar function or > dummy function) for all arch's. This sounds more like "let's kill Andrew". I count 489 instances in the tree. Please don't expect this activity to take top priority ;)