From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner+willy=40w.ods.org-S262995AbVAFU40@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S262995AbVAFU40 (ORCPT <rfc822;willy@w.ods.org>);
	Thu, 6 Jan 2005 15:56:26 -0500
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261173AbVAFUwk
	(ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel-outgoing>);
	Thu, 6 Jan 2005 15:52:40 -0500
Received: from [81.23.229.73] ([81.23.229.73]:37551 "EHLO mail.eduonline.nl")
	by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262995AbVAFUvR (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Thu, 6 Jan 2005 15:51:17 -0500
From: Norbert van Nobelen <norbert-kernel@edusupport.nl>
Organization: EduSupport BV
To: Lee Revell <rlrevell@joe-job.com>
Subject: Re: Open hardware wireless cards
Date: Thu, 6 Jan 2005 21:51:13 +0100
User-Agent: KMail/1.6.2
References: <20050105200526.GL5159@ruslug.rutgers.edu> <200501062006.49542.norbert-kernel@edusupport.nl> <1105044024.15770.7.camel@krustophenia.net>
In-Reply-To: <1105044024.15770.7.camel@krustophenia.net>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <200501062151.13882.norbert-kernel@edusupport.nl>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

Err, music, computers: Just spend a lot of time to get a series of thin 
clients running sound over a DSL network (now in testing phase, need to solve 
some network problems first :-( )

I think the idea for a good sound card is good too, I am only thinking 
different about the manufacturing. Ordering 100 cards is not going to be 
attractive in any way with price, then just use the conexant wrappers for 
windows drivers, and run your card that way. GPL is one issue, wallet content 
is the next following important issue.
Wireless cards have to go cheaper all the time. One way to scrape of another 
50cents of the manufacturing cost is by using an open developed card en 
driver. That way the card will lie in many stores and is easily obtainable 
for everybody.
The extra encryption will get the phreaks on board with it, so spreading the 
idea of open source development even further, plus it is also a show and tell 
to the market like: Open source groups are innovative, and not just copycats 
who want everything for free (like in wallet content).

On Thursday 06 January 2005 21:40, you wrote:
> On Thu, 2005-01-06 at 20:06 +0100, Norbert van Nobelen wrote:
> > My personal opinion
> > Sound is mainly integrated on boards. Since developing a high end card is
> > not an easy job, and the market is pretty small for that (enough
> > competition), I think the wireless card is not too weird to do
>
> Yeah but that's all useless to pro audio users.  And the market for pro
> audio hardware is a lot more like the general pro audio gear market than
> the computer hardware market.  Lower volume, much higher margins.
>
> Compared to the open video card project, this should be a no brainer,
> and that seems to be taking off...
>
> > Plus wireless is hot. What we can do is implement the standard and add a
> > little extra once we are done with that, linux a nice encryption layer
> > for linux to linux communication, thus giving linux (or a windowsbox with
> > the right drivers), a nice edge.
>
> There's a standard for audio-over-firewire but it's inadequate (no
> routing/connection management) so you can't just implement it.

Firewire or USB: I do not care for an antenna for the simple reason that I 
just want a powercord (-:

>
> Also making music with computers is pretty hot too if you haven't
> noticed ;-)
>
> Lee

-- 
<a href="http://www.edusupport.nl">EduSupport: Linux Desktop for schools and 
small to medium business in The Netherlands and Belgium</a>