From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261557AbVAGVPL (ORCPT ); Fri, 7 Jan 2005 16:15:11 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261617AbVAGVOx (ORCPT ); Fri, 7 Jan 2005 16:14:53 -0500 Received: from colin2.muc.de ([193.149.48.15]:10001 "HELO colin2.muc.de") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S261557AbVAGVMB (ORCPT ); Fri, 7 Jan 2005 16:12:01 -0500 Date: 7 Jan 2005 22:12:00 +0100 Date: Fri, 7 Jan 2005 22:12:00 +0100 From: Andi Kleen To: YhLu Cc: Matt Domsch , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, discuss@x86-64.org, jamesclv@us.ibm.com, suresh.b.siddha@intel.com Subject: Re: 256 apic id for amd64 Message-ID: <20050107211200.GA36896@muc.de> References: <3174569B9743D511922F00A0C94314230729132B@TYANWEB> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3174569B9743D511922F00A0C94314230729132B@TYANWEB> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Jan 07, 2005 at 01:14:24PM -0800, YhLu wrote: > After keep the bsp using 0, the jiffies works well. Werid? Probably a bug somewhere. But since BSP should be always 0 I'm not sure it is worth tracking down. -Andi