From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261667AbVAGWeI (ORCPT ); Fri, 7 Jan 2005 17:34:08 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261677AbVAGWcs (ORCPT ); Fri, 7 Jan 2005 17:32:48 -0500 Received: from out007pub.verizon.net ([206.46.170.107]:30968 "EHLO out007.verizon.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261667AbVAGWWe (ORCPT ); Fri, 7 Jan 2005 17:22:34 -0500 Message-Id: <200501072222.j07MMMHn019592@localhost.localdomain> To: Andrew Morton cc: Lee Revell , arjanv@redhat.com, hch@infradead.org, mingo@elte.hu, chrisw@osdl.org, alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk, joq@io.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] [request for inclusion] Realtime LSM In-reply-to: Your message of "Fri, 07 Jan 2005 13:49:41 PST." <20050107134941.11cecbfc.akpm@osdl.org> Date: Fri, 07 Jan 2005 17:22:22 -0500 From: Paul Davis X-Authentication-Info: Submitted using SMTP AUTH at out007.verizon.net from [151.197.185.179] at Fri, 7 Jan 2005 16:22:24 -0600 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org >> Last I checked they could be controlled separately in that module. It >> has been suggested (by me and others) that one possible solution would >> be to expand it to be generic for all caps. > >Maybe this is the way? that would make a much more complex LSM, and thus opens the doors to some inadvertent security hazard that doesn't arise in the simpler tool we have now. other than that, its not a terrible suggestion at all, just a lot, lot more work. --p