From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261278AbVAHTPI (ORCPT ); Sat, 8 Jan 2005 14:15:08 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261276AbVAHTPH (ORCPT ); Sat, 8 Jan 2005 14:15:07 -0500 Received: from verein.lst.de ([213.95.11.210]:44739 "EHLO mail.lst.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261273AbVAHTPE (ORCPT ); Sat, 8 Jan 2005 14:15:04 -0500 Date: Sat, 8 Jan 2005 20:14:57 +0100 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Roland Dreier Cc: Christoph Hellwig , davej@redhat.com, hannal@us.ibm.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] fix pci_get_device conversion in intel-agp Message-ID: <20050108191457.GA7131@lst.de> References: <20050108190815.GA7031@lst.de> <52fz1b20qd.fsf@topspin.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <52fz1b20qd.fsf@topspin.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i X-Spam-Score: -4.901 () BAYES_00 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sat, Jan 08, 2005 at 11:13:14AM -0800, Roland Dreier wrote: > > + if (intel_i810_private.i810_dev) > > + pci_dev_put(intel_i810_private.i830_dev); > > + if (intel_i810_private.i830_dev) > > + pci_dev_put(intel_i830_private.i830_dev); > > Is there a typo in the patch here -- should the first put be for i810_dev? Yes.