From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262243AbVAIELM (ORCPT ); Sat, 8 Jan 2005 23:11:12 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262247AbVAIELL (ORCPT ); Sat, 8 Jan 2005 23:11:11 -0500 Received: from inti.inf.utfsm.cl ([200.1.21.155]:46983 "EHLO inti.inf.utfsm.cl") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262243AbVAIEKv (ORCPT ); Sat, 8 Jan 2005 23:10:51 -0500 Message-Id: <200501090344.j093irLf027560@laptop11.inf.utfsm.cl> To: Jon Smirl cc: lkml Subject: Re: kernel versions on Linus bk tree In-Reply-To: Message from Jon Smirl of "Sat, 08 Jan 2005 13:23:20 CDT." <9e473391050108102355c9a714@mail.gmail.com> X-Mailer: MH-E 7.4.2; nmh 1.0.4; XEmacs 21.4 (patch 15) Date: Sun, 09 Jan 2005 00:44:52 -0300 From: Horst von Brand X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-1.7.4 (inti.inf.utfsm.cl [200.1.21.155]); Sun, 09 Jan 2005 01:10:46 -0300 (CLST) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Jon Smirl said: > I just came across a problem with the way the kernel is being > versioned. The DRM driver needs an IFDEF for the four level page table > change depending on kernel version built against. I used this: > #if LINUX_VERSION_CODE < 0x02060a Wait for 2.6.11 then. It is the price you pay for fooling around with kernels in between versions. If you are experimenting, you know what you are working with, so what is the problem? -- Dr. Horst H. von Brand User #22616 counter.li.org Departamento de Informatica Fono: +56 32 654431 Universidad Tecnica Federico Santa Maria +56 32 654239 Casilla 110-V, Valparaiso, Chile Fax: +56 32 797513