From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261728AbVAITkQ (ORCPT ); Sun, 9 Jan 2005 14:40:16 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261732AbVAITkQ (ORCPT ); Sun, 9 Jan 2005 14:40:16 -0500 Received: from p3EE2B9FA.dip.t-dialin.net ([62.226.185.250]:45072 "EHLO mail.linux-mips.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261728AbVAITkN (ORCPT ); Sun, 9 Jan 2005 14:40:13 -0500 Date: Sun, 9 Jan 2005 20:39:44 +0100 From: Ralf Baechle To: Arjan van de Ven Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@osdl.org, akpm@osdl.org Subject: Re: removing bcopy... because it's half broken Message-ID: <20050109193944.GA19083@linux-mips.org> References: <20050109192305.GA7476@infradead.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20050109192305.GA7476@infradead.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sun, Jan 09, 2005 at 07:23:05PM +0000, Arjan van de Ven wrote: For a long time MIPS has defined __HAVE_ARCH_BCOPY without actually implementing bcopy, so any kernel use did result in a build error. As far as I can recall all that it has caught were a few missconfigured gccs, so yes, away with it. Ralf