archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli <>
To: Anton Blanchard <>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ppc64: kprobes breaks BUG() handling
Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2005 18:08:26 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <>

On Mon, Jan 10, 2005 at 10:19:37PM +1100, Anton Blanchard wrote:
> Hi,
> I was running some tests and noticed BUG() handling wasnt working as
> expected. The kprobes code has some code to check for breakpoint
> removal races and only checks for one opcode. It turns out there are
> many forms of the breakpoint instruction, comparing against one is not
> good enough.

Ah yes! I see that BUG() uses twi. I will try and send out a patch for
this soon.


  reply	other threads:[~2005-01-10 12:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-01-10 11:19 [PATCH] ppc64: kprobes breaks BUG() handling Anton Blanchard
2005-01-10 12:38 ` Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli [this message]
2005-01-12 11:30 ` Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \ \ \ \ \ \ \

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).