archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Russell King <>
To: Pierre Ossman <>
Cc: Alan Cox <>, Adrian Bunk <>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <>,
Subject: Re: [2.6 patch] remove SPF-using wbsd lists from MAINTAINERS
Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2005 21:29:33 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <>; from on Mon, Jan 10, 2005 at 10:21:01PM +0100

On Mon, Jan 10, 2005 at 10:21:01PM +0100, Pierre Ossman wrote:
> Alan Cox wrote:
> > On Llu, 2005-01-10 at 18:43, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > 
> >>IMHO lists rejecting emails based on some non-standard extension don't 
> >>belong into MAINTAINERS.
> > 
> > 
> > Find out why someone is publishing records saying your mail isnt valid
> > instead of moaning here. If they are using SPF and you are not using any
> > strange extensions its fine. You or your provider appears to be
> > advertising that doesn't use the mail relay you are using.
> > 
> I think I've fixed the problem now. It wasn't that there were published 
> records for, the problem was that the mail server couldn't 
> resolve your domain. For some reason everything from the DNS I'm using 
> to your DNS gets dropped. The mail server takes the paranoid route and 
> assumes the worst when it cannot contact dns servers (that's why you got 
> a 4xx, not a 5xx). I've now changed DNS which will hopefully solve the 
> issue.
> As for dropping the mailing list out of MAINTAINERS then I'd prefer you 
> didn't (of course). But I will not remove the filters on the servers 
> since they remove a lot of spam. If that means it cannot be in 
> MAINTAINERS, then so be it.

You may wish to check the source port which your DNS servers are using
to perform lookups.  I've had a situation recently where someone was
unable to send me mail.  Upon investigation, I found that my name
servers couldn't resolve his domain, but plain 'dig' on the same box

I've come across ISPs who think they should block DNS requests from
certain _source_ ports to "improve" their security, which may explain
what you're seeing.

If this is the case, I suggest Adrian finds a better ISP.

Russell King
 Linux kernel    2.6 ARM Linux   -
 maintainer of:  2.6 PCMCIA      -
                 2.6 Serial core

  reply	other threads:[~2005-01-10 21:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-01-10 18:43 [2.6 patch] remove SPF-using wbsd lists from MAINTAINERS Adrian Bunk
2005-01-10 19:08 ` Russell King
2005-01-10 19:21   ` Adrian Bunk
2005-01-10 21:11     ` Russell King
2005-01-11 16:10     ` Alan Cox
2005-01-10 22:49   ` David Woodhouse
2005-01-10 19:23 ` Alan Cox
2005-01-10 21:21   ` Pierre Ossman
2005-01-10 21:29     ` Russell King [this message]
2005-01-10 22:04     ` Adrian Bunk
2005-01-10 22:22       ` Pierre Ossman
2005-01-10 22:42         ` Adrian Bunk
2005-01-11 11:14           ` Ondrej Zary
2005-01-10 23:36   ` David Schwartz
2005-01-11  1:03     ` Pierre Ossman
2005-01-10 19:55 ` Stephen Pollei
2005-01-11  5:54 ` Valdis.Kletnieks

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).