From: Ryan Anderson <ryan@michonline.com>
To: Jon Smirl <jonsmirl@gmail.com>
Cc: lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
kai@germaschewski.name, sam@ravnborg.org
Subject: Re: kernel versions on Linus bk tree
Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2005 18:55:25 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050110235525.GG3748@mythryan2.michonline.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <9e473391050108102355c9a714@mail.gmail.com>
On Sat, Jan 08, 2005 at 01:23:20PM -0500, Jon Smirl wrote:
> One solution would be to bump the version in Linus bk to 2.6.11-rc1 on
> the first check in after 2.6.10 is cut. The general case of this would
> be to always bump the Linus bk version number immediately after
> cutting the released version.
>
> I've been bitten by this ambiguity before when kernels from Linus BK
> have more code in them than the one from kernel.org and have the same
> version number. Changing the timing of the version bump would lessen
> this problem since kernels complied from Linus bk tend to have a short
> life.
I've got a patch in my local tree that tries to solve this through an
attempt to auto-append -bkXXXXXXXX (where each X is hex-digit of the md5
hash of the top-of-tree BK commit).
It doesn't solve the particular problem that caused you to send this
mail, but I think it solves the "modules from a -BK tree overwrite official releases"
problem that prompted me to code up this patch.
(Sam, Kai, I added you in case you have the time to look at this and
apply it or provide some feedback on my approach. I have both a shell
script that depends on md5sum, and a Perl script in the patch.)
Signed-Off-By: Ryan Anderson <ryan@michonline.com>
diff -Nru a/Makefile b/Makefile
--- a/Makefile 2004-10-27 04:33:05 -04:00
+++ b/Makefile 2004-10-27 04:33:05 -04:00
@@ -513,6 +513,24 @@
#export INSTALL_PATH=/boot
+# If CONFIG_LOCALVERSION_AUTO is set, we automatically perform some tests
+# and try to determine if the current source tree is a release tree, of any sort,
+# or if is a pure development tree.
+# A 'release tree' is any tree with a BitKeeper TAG associated with it.
+# The primary goal of this is to make it safe for a native BitKeeper user to
+# build a release tree (i.e, 2.6.9) and also to continue developing against the
+# current Linus tree, without having the Linus tree overwrite the 2.6.9 tree
+# when installed.
+#
+# (In the future, CVS and SVN support will be added as well.)
+
+ifeq ($(CONFIG_LOCALVERSION_AUTO),y)
+ ifeq ($(shell ls -d $(srctree)/BitKeeper 2>/dev/null),$(srctree)/BitKeeper)
+ localversion-bk := $(shell $(srctree)/scripts/setlocalversion.sh $(srctree) $(objtree))
+ LOCALVERSION := $(LOCALVERSION)$(localversion-bk)
+ endif
+endif
+
#
# INSTALL_MOD_PATH specifies a prefix to MODLIB for module directory
# relocations required by build roots. This is not defined in the
diff -Nru a/init/Kconfig b/init/Kconfig
--- a/init/Kconfig 2004-10-27 04:33:05 -04:00
+++ b/init/Kconfig 2004-10-27 04:33:05 -04:00
@@ -69,6 +69,18 @@
object and source tree, in that order. Your total string can
be a maximum of 64 characters.
+config LOCALVERSION_AUTO
+ bool "Automatically append version information to the version string"
+ default y
+ help
+ This will try to automatically determine if the current tree is a
+ release tree by looking for BitKeeper tags that belong to the
+ current top of tree revision.
+ A string of the format -BKxxxxxxxx will be added to the
+ localversion. The string generated by this will be appended
+ after any matching localversion* files, but before the
+ value set in CONFIG_LOCALVERSION
+
config SWAP
bool "Support for paging of anonymous memory (swap)"
depends on MMU
diff -Nru a/scripts/setlocalversion b/scripts/setlocalversion
--- /dev/null Wed Dec 31 16:00:00 196900
+++ b/scripts/setlocalversion 2004-10-27 04:33:05 -04:00
@@ -0,0 +1,62 @@
+#!/usr/bin/perl
+# Copyright 2004 - Ryan Anderson <ryan@michonline.com> GPL v2
+
+use strict;
+use warnings;
+use Digest::MD5;
+require 5.006;
+
+if (@ARGV != 2) {
+ print <<EOT;
+Usage: setlocalversion <srctree> <objtree>
+EOT
+ exit(1);
+}
+
+my $debug = 0;
+
+my ($srctree,$objtree) = @ARGV;
+
+my @LOCALVERSIONS = ();
+
+# BitKeeper Version Checks
+
+# We are going to use the following commands to try and determine if
+# this repository is at a Version boundary (i.e, 2.6.10 vs 2.6.10 + some patches)
+# We currently assume that all meaningful version boundaries are marked by a tag.
+# We don't care what the tag is, just that something exists.
+
+#ryan@mythryan2 ~/dev/linux/local$ T=`bk changes -r+ -k`
+#ryan@mythryan2 ~/dev/linux/local$ bk prs -h -d':TAG:\n' -r$T
+
+sub do_bk_checks {
+ chdir($srctree);
+ my $changeset = `bk changes -r+ -k`;
+ chomp $changeset;
+ my $tag = `bk prs -h -d':TAG:' -r'$changeset'`;
+
+ printf("ChangeSet Key = '%s'\nTAG = '%s'\n", $changeset, $tag) if ($debug > 0);
+
+ if (length($tag) == 0) {
+ # We do not have a tag at the Top of Tree, so we need to generate a localversion file
+ # We'll use the given $changeset as input into this.
+ my $localversion = Digest::MD5::md5_hex($changeset);
+ $localversion = substr($localversion,0,8);
+
+ printf("localversion = '%s'\n",$localversion) if ($debug > 0);
+
+ push @LOCALVERSIONS, "BK" . $localversion;
+
+ }
+}
+
+
+if ( -d "BitKeeper" ) {
+ my $bk = `which bk`;
+ chomp $bk;
+ if (length($bk) != 0) {
+ do_bk_checks();
+ }
+}
+
+printf "-%s\n", join("-",@LOCALVERSIONS) if (scalar @LOCALVERSIONS > 0);
diff -Nru a/scripts/setlocalversion.sh b/scripts/setlocalversion.sh
--- /dev/null Wed Dec 31 16:00:00 196900
+++ b/scripts/setlocalversion.sh 2004-10-27 04:33:05 -04:00
@@ -0,0 +1,19 @@
+#!/bin/sh
+
+BK=`which bk`
+
+srctree=$1
+objtree=$2
+
+if [ "$BK" == "" ];
+then
+ echo "scripts/setlocalversion.sh: Failed to find BK, not appending a -BK* version" >&2
+ exit 0
+fi
+
+cd $srctree
+changeset=`$BK changes -r+ -k`
+tag=`$BK prs -h -d':TAG:' -r'$changeset'`
+if [ "$tag" == "" ]; then
+ echo -n $changeset | md5sum | awk '{printf "-BK%s",substr($1,1,8)}'
+fi
--
Ryan Anderson
sometimes Pug Majere
prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-01-11 0:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-01-08 18:23 kernel versions on Linus bk tree Jon Smirl
2005-01-08 18:54 ` Vincent Hanquez
2005-01-08 19:00 ` Vincent Hanquez
2005-01-09 3:44 ` Horst von Brand
2005-01-10 22:26 ` Pavel Machek
2005-01-10 23:55 ` Ryan Anderson [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20050110235525.GG3748@mythryan2.michonline.com \
--to=ryan@michonline.com \
--cc=jonsmirl@gmail.com \
--cc=kai@germaschewski.name \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sam@ravnborg.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).