From: Andries Brouwer <aebr@win.tue.nl>
To: Andries Brouwer <aebr@win.tue.nl>
Cc: Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de>, Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Do PS/2 ESDI users exist?
Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2005 05:32:20 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050111043220.GB2760@pclin040.win.tue.nl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20050108234337.GE6052@pclin040.win.tue.nl>
Yesterday I mentioned that patch 2.3.13 killed the setup,
so that tp720_setup and ed_setup would not be called anymore.
Hand-specifying the geometry failed from then on.
Since nobody noticed, maybe nobody with compiled-in ps2esdi
needed to specify the geometry.
In 2.1.128 (Nov 1998) the driver was modularised, but that patch
contained a few typos so that the driver would not build as a module.
Several people - all without ps2 hardware - submitted a patch,
and the correction finally went into patch-2.6.0-test6 (Sep 2003).
All that time, no actual (potential) users complained.
So, maybe nobody tried to use it as a module.
Google shows that lots of people have CONFIG_BLK_DEV_PS2=m.
Why didn't they notice? Because that setting results (e.g. under 2.4) in
#undef CONFIG_BLK_DEV_PS2
#define CONFIG_BLK_DEV_PS2_MODULE 1
in <linux/autoconf.h>, and ps2esdi.c is inside #ifdef CONFIG_BLK_DEV_PS2.
Have there ever existed ESDI users? Yes, using out-of-tree patches before
2.1.15, and in the 2.1 - 2.2 time frame. I seem to be unable to find traces
of later users - just a few people who try and fail.
I wonder whether ps2esdi should be removed.
Does the present driver work for someone?
Have there been users in this millennium? With 2.3 or later?
Andries
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-01-11 4:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-01-08 21:40 [2.6 patch] drivers/block/ps2esdi.c: remove two unused functions (fwd) Adrian Bunk
2005-01-08 23:43 ` Andries Brouwer
2005-01-11 4:32 ` Andries Brouwer [this message]
2005-01-11 4:49 ` Do PS/2 ESDI users exist? Andrew Morton
2005-01-15 19:01 ` Andries Brouwer
2005-01-11 10:37 ` Erik Mouw
2005-01-11 16:10 ` Alan Cox
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20050111043220.GB2760@pclin040.win.tue.nl \
--to=aebr@win.tue.nl \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=bunk@stusta.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).