From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261225AbVALSVv (ORCPT ); Wed, 12 Jan 2005 13:21:51 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261288AbVALSVu (ORCPT ); Wed, 12 Jan 2005 13:21:50 -0500 Received: from host62-24-231-113.dsl.vispa.com ([62.24.231.113]:33712 "EHLO cenedra.walrond.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261265AbVALSUH (ORCPT ); Wed, 12 Jan 2005 13:20:07 -0500 From: Andrew Walrond To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: page table lock patch V15 [0/7]: overview Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2005 18:20:02 +0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.7.2 References: <20050112174101.GA5838@infradead.org> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200501121820.02337.andrew@walrond.org> X-Spam-Score: 4.3 (++++) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wednesday 12 January 2005 17:52, Christoph Lameter wrote: > On Wed, 12 Jan 2005, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > These smaller systems are more likely x86/x86_64 machines ;-) > > But they will not have been build in 1998 either like the machine I used > for the i386 tests. Could you do some tests on contemporary x86/x86_64 > SMP systems with large memory? I have various dual x86_64 systems with 1-4Gb ram. What tests do you want run? Andrew Walrond