From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261249AbVALS4a (ORCPT ); Wed, 12 Jan 2005 13:56:30 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261260AbVALSyo (ORCPT ); Wed, 12 Jan 2005 13:54:44 -0500 Received: from e33.co.us.ibm.com ([32.97.110.131]:10942 "EHLO e33.co.us.ibm.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261275AbVALSvk (ORCPT ); Wed, 12 Jan 2005 13:51:40 -0500 Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2005 10:41:27 -0800 From: Greg KH To: "Randy.Dunlap" Cc: Andrew Morton , Al Viro , paulmck@us.ibm.com, arjan@infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, jtk@us.ibm.com, wtaber@us.ibm.com, pbadari@us.ibm.com, markv@us.ibm.com, greghk@us.ibm.com, Linus Torvalds , linux@brodo.de Subject: Re: [PATCH] add feature-removal-schedule.txt documentation Message-ID: <20050112184127.GA10599@kroah.com> References: <20050106190538.GB1618@us.ibm.com> <1105039259.4468.9.camel@laptopd505.fenrus.org> <20050106201531.GJ1292@us.ibm.com> <20050106203258.GN26051@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk> <20050106210408.GM1292@us.ibm.com> <20050106212417.GQ26051@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk> <20050106152621.395f935e.akpm@osdl.org> <20050106235633.GA10110@kroah.com> <41DEC0BF.4010708@osdl.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <41DEC0BF.4010708@osdl.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Jan 07, 2005 at 09:02:55AM -0800, Randy.Dunlap wrote: > Greg KH wrote: > >On Thu, Jan 06, 2005 at 03:26:21PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote: > > > >>Which begs the question "how do we ever get rid of these things when we > >>have no projected date for Linux-2.8"? > >> > >>I'd propose: > >> > >>a) Create Documentation/feature-removal-schedule.txt which describes > >> things which are going away, when, why, who is involved, etc. > > > >Ok, I'll bite, here's a patch that does just that. Look good? > > Brodo, can you add a little more info to this, please? > > --- > Add 2.4.x cpufreq /proc and sysctl interface removal > to the feature-removal-schedule. > > Signed-off-by: Randy Dunlap Applied, thanks. greg k-h