From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261874AbVANDRT (ORCPT ); Thu, 13 Jan 2005 22:17:19 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261877AbVANDQN (ORCPT ); Thu, 13 Jan 2005 22:16:13 -0500 Received: from fw.osdl.org ([65.172.181.6]:16302 "EHLO mail.osdl.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261874AbVANDGM (ORCPT ); Thu, 13 Jan 2005 22:06:12 -0500 Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2005 19:05:36 -0800 From: Andrew Morton To: Michal Ludvig Cc: davem@davemloft.net, jmorris@redhat.com, cryptoapi@lists.logix.cz, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] PadLock processing multiple blocks at a time Message-Id: <20050113190536.11850b63.akpm@osdl.org> In-Reply-To: References: <20041130222442.7b0f4f67.davem@davemloft.net> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.7 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-redhat-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Michal Ludvig wrote: > > # > # Update to padlock-aes.c that enables processing of the whole > # buffer of data at once with the given chaining mode (e.g. CBC). > # Please don't email different patche sunder the same Subject:. Choose a Subject: which is meaningful for each patch? This one kills gcc-2.95.x: drivers/crypto/padlock-aes.c: In function `aes_padlock': drivers/crypto/padlock-aes.c:391: impossible register constraint in `asm' drivers/crypto/padlock-aes.c:402: impossible register constraint in `asm' drivers/crypto/padlock-aes.c:413: impossible register constraint in `asm' drivers/crypto/padlock-aes.c:391: `asm' needs too many reloads