From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261800AbVAZJnO (ORCPT ); Wed, 26 Jan 2005 04:43:14 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262075AbVAZJnO (ORCPT ); Wed, 26 Jan 2005 04:43:14 -0500 Received: from pentafluge.infradead.org ([213.146.154.40]:19120 "EHLO pentafluge.infradead.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261800AbVAZJnM (ORCPT ); Wed, 26 Jan 2005 04:43:12 -0500 Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2005 09:43:08 +0000 From: Christoph Hellwig To: "Paul E. McKenney" Cc: Arjan van de Ven , Trond Myklebust , viro@zenII.uk.linux.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Andrew Morton Subject: Re: make flock_lock_file_wait static Message-ID: <20050126094308.GA7326@infradead.org> Mail-Followup-To: Christoph Hellwig , "Paul E. McKenney" , Arjan van de Ven , Trond Myklebust , viro@zenII.uk.linux.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Andrew Morton References: <20050109194209.GA7588@infradead.org> <1105310650.11315.19.camel@lade.trondhjem.org> <1105345168.4171.11.camel@laptopd505.fenrus.org> <1105346324.4171.16.camel@laptopd505.fenrus.org> <1105367014.11462.13.camel@lade.trondhjem.org> <1105432299.3917.11.camel@laptopd505.fenrus.org> <1105471004.12005.46.camel@lade.trondhjem.org> <1105472182.3917.49.camel@laptopd505.fenrus.org> <20050125185812.GA1499@us.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20050125185812.GA1499@us.ibm.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i X-SRS-Rewrite: SMTP reverse-path rewritten from by pentafluge.infradead.org See http://www.infradead.org/rpr.html Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > o vfs_follow_link(): used to interpret symbolic links, which > might point outside of SAN Filesystem. This one is going away very soon, including the whole old-style ->follow_link support - for technical reasons. Please convert your driver to put the contents of the symlink into ... and implement ->put_link like all intree filesystems already did. Without that we can't bump the limit on recursive symlinks, a feature that IBM has been pushing for very hard, btw..