From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262716AbVA1Szc (ORCPT ); Fri, 28 Jan 2005 13:55:32 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262728AbVA1SwB (ORCPT ); Fri, 28 Jan 2005 13:52:01 -0500 Received: from pentafluge.infradead.org ([213.146.154.40]:10472 "EHLO pentafluge.infradead.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261515AbVA1Sua (ORCPT ); Fri, 28 Jan 2005 13:50:30 -0500 Date: Fri, 28 Jan 2005 18:50:17 +0000 From: Christoph Hellwig To: "Paul E. McKenney" Cc: Arjan van de Ven , Arjan van de Ven , Trond Myklebust , viro@zenII.uk.linux.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Andrew Morton Subject: Re: make flock_lock_file_wait static Message-ID: <20050128185017.GA21760@infradead.org> Mail-Followup-To: Christoph Hellwig , "Paul E. McKenney" , Arjan van de Ven , Arjan van de Ven , Trond Myklebust , viro@zenII.uk.linux.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Andrew Morton References: <1105346324.4171.16.camel@laptopd505.fenrus.org> <1105367014.11462.13.camel@lade.trondhjem.org> <1105432299.3917.11.camel@laptopd505.fenrus.org> <1105471004.12005.46.camel@lade.trondhjem.org> <1105472182.3917.49.camel@laptopd505.fenrus.org> <20050125185812.GA1499@us.ibm.com> <1106730061.6307.62.camel@laptopd505.fenrus.org> <20050126160715.GB1266@us.ibm.com> <1106765983.6307.134.camel@laptopd505.fenrus.org> <20050128141446.GA1868@us.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20050128141446.GA1868@us.ibm.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i X-SRS-Rewrite: SMTP reverse-path rewritten from by pentafluge.infradead.org See http://www.infradead.org/rpr.html Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Jan 28, 2005 at 06:14:46AM -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote: > In my experience, the only way to get exports into a major distribution > is to get them into mainline kernel.org. If you can get Red Hat to > change its stance on this, works for me! That's not the point. You're trying to let us work for you for free without any gain for us.