From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner+willy=40w.ods.org-S261425AbVBNM1h@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S261425AbVBNM1h (ORCPT <rfc822;willy@w.ods.org>);
	Mon, 14 Feb 2005 07:27:37 -0500
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261424AbVBNM1g
	(ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel-outgoing>);
	Mon, 14 Feb 2005 07:27:36 -0500
Received: from mail.linicks.net ([217.204.244.146]:38797 "EHLO
	linux233.linicks.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S261425AbVBNM13 (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Mon, 14 Feb 2005 07:27:29 -0500
From: Nick Warne <nick@linicks.net>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: make menuconfig
Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2005 12:27:28 +0000
User-Agent: KMail/1.7.2
References: <200502141134.19094.nick@linicks.net> <Pine.LNX.4.61.0502141301310.6118@scrub.home>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.61.0502141301310.6118@scrub.home>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Message-Id: <200502141227.28214.nick@linicks.net>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Monday 14 February 2005 12:12, you wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, 14 Feb 2005, Nick Warne wrote:
> > Are the  optimize  &&  ? lines normal?
>
> They are only debug prints, but I'm quite sure they are fixed in recent
> versions.
>
> > This is from a current tree that has an uptime of > 50 days
>
> Could you specify "current tree"?

Yes, sorry, my bad wording.  This is kernel 2.6.4 from kernel.org.  I meant 
_my_ 'current' tree that runs perfect on the 233 box.  I can't seem to 
upgrade to later 2.6.x kernels as I get curious swapd oops after a few hours, 
but that is another story.

So I can ignore the debug prints?

Thanks,

Nick


-- 
"When you're chewing on life's gristle,
Don't grumble, Give a whistle..."