From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262349AbVCHVUo (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 Mar 2005 16:20:44 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262350AbVCHVUo (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 Mar 2005 16:20:44 -0500 Received: from pentafluge.infradead.org ([213.146.154.40]:54999 "EHLO pentafluge.infradead.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262349AbVCHVUk (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 Mar 2005 16:20:40 -0500 Date: Tue, 8 Mar 2005 21:20:27 +0000 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Lee Revell Cc: Christoph Hellwig , Andrew Morton , Ingo Molnar , paul@linuxaudiosystems.com, mpm@selenic.com, joq@io.com, cfriesen@nortelnetworks.com, Chris Wright , arjanv@redhat.com, alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] [request for inclusion] Realtime LSM Message-ID: <20050308212027.GA17664@infradead.org> Mail-Followup-To: Christoph Hellwig , Lee Revell , Andrew Morton , Ingo Molnar , paul@linuxaudiosystems.com, mpm@selenic.com, joq@io.com, cfriesen@nortelnetworks.com, Chris Wright , arjanv@redhat.com, alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <20050112185258.GG2940@waste.org> <200501122116.j0CLGK3K022477@localhost.localdomain> <20050307195020.510a1ceb.akpm@osdl.org> <20050308035503.GA31704@infradead.org> <20050307201646.512a2471.akpm@osdl.org> <20050308042242.GA15356@elte.hu> <20050307202821.150bd023.akpm@osdl.org> <20050308043250.GA32746@infradead.org> <1110308156.4401.4.camel@mindpipe> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1110308156.4401.4.camel@mindpipe> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i X-SRS-Rewrite: SMTP reverse-path rewritten from by pentafluge.infradead.org See http://www.infradead.org/rpr.html Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Mar 08, 2005 at 01:55:55PM -0500, Lee Revell wrote: > And as I mentioned a few times, the authors have neither the inclination > nor the ability to do that, because they are not kernel hackers. The > realtime LSM was written by users (not developers) of the kernel, to > solve a specific real world problem. No one ever claimed it was the > correct solution from the kernel POV. And I told you that doesn't matter. If someone wants a feature in they should find a way to make it palable. We're not accepting such excuses to put in crap.