From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261270AbVDIEJX (ORCPT ); Sat, 9 Apr 2005 00:09:23 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261279AbVDIEJX (ORCPT ); Sat, 9 Apr 2005 00:09:23 -0400 Received: from sccrmhc11.comcast.net ([204.127.202.55]:22488 "EHLO sccrmhc11.comcast.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261270AbVDIEJV (ORCPT ); Sat, 9 Apr 2005 00:09:21 -0400 Date: Sat, 09 Apr 2005 00:06:18 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: <20050409.000618.115917923.wlandry@ucsd.edu> To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: arx-users@nongnu.org Subject: Re: Kernel SCM saga.. From: Walter Landry X-Mailer: Mew version 3.3 on Emacs 21.4 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Linus Torvalds wrote: > Which is why I'd love to hear from people who have actually used > various SCM's with the kernel. There's bound to be people who have > already tried. At the end of my Codecon talk, there is a performance comparison of a number of different distributed SCM's with the kernel. http://superbeast.ucsd.edu/~landry/ArX/codecon/codecon.html I develop ArX (http://www.nongnu.org/arx). You may find it of interest ;) Cheers, Walter Landry wlandry@ucsd.edu