linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
To: Badari Pulavarty <pbadari@us.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: 2.6.12-rc6-mm1 & 2K lun testing
Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2005 17:51:30 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050616175130.22572451.akpm@osdl.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1118965381.4301.488.camel@dyn9047017072.beaverton.ibm.com>

Badari Pulavarty <pbadari@us.ibm.com> wrote:
>
> > Try this:
>  > 
>  > diff -puN mm/page-writeback.c~a mm/page-writeback.c
>  > --- 25/mm/page-writeback.c~a	Thu Jun 16 13:36:29 2005
>  > +++ 25-akpm/mm/page-writeback.c	Thu Jun 16 13:36:54 2005
>  > @@ -501,6 +501,8 @@ void laptop_sync_completion(void)
>  >  
>  >  static void set_ratelimit(void)
>  >  {
>  > +	ratelimit_pages = 32;
>  > +	return;
>  >  	ratelimit_pages = total_pages / (num_online_cpus() * 32);
>  >  	if (ratelimit_pages < 16)
>  >  		ratelimit_pages = 16;
>  > _
>  > 
> 
>  Wow !! Reducing the dirty ratios and the above patch did the trick.
>  Instead of 100% sys CPU, now I have only 50% in sys.

It shouldn't be necessary to do both.  Either the patch or the tuning
should fix it.  Please confirm.

Also please determine whether the deep CFQ queue depth is a problem when
the VFS tuning/patching is in place.

IOW: let's work out which of these three areas needs to be addressed.

  reply	other threads:[~2005-06-17  0:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-06-15 17:36 2.6.12-rc6-mm1 & 2K lun testing Badari Pulavarty
2005-06-15 18:30 ` Nick Piggin
2005-06-15 18:30   ` Badari Pulavarty
2005-06-15 19:02     ` Nick Piggin
2005-06-15 20:56       ` Badari Pulavarty
2005-06-16  1:48         ` Nick Piggin
2005-06-15 23:23   ` Dave Chinner
2005-06-15 21:39 ` Chen, Kenneth W
2005-06-15 22:35   ` Badari Pulavarty
2005-06-16  7:24 ` Andrew Morton
2005-06-16 19:50   ` Badari Pulavarty
2005-06-16 20:37     ` Andrew Morton
2005-06-16 23:43       ` Badari Pulavarty
2005-06-17  0:51         ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2005-06-17 15:10           ` Badari Pulavarty
2005-06-17 21:13             ` Andrew Morton
2005-06-22  0:34               ` 2.6.12-mm1 & 2K lun testing (JFS problem ?) Badari Pulavarty
2005-06-22  1:41                 ` William Lee Irwin III
2005-06-22 16:23                   ` Badari Pulavarty
2005-06-22 13:50                 ` Dave Kleikamp
2005-06-22 16:56                   ` Badari Pulavarty
2005-06-22 21:02                   ` Badari Pulavarty
2005-06-16 22:42     ` 2.6.12-rc6-mm1 & 2K lun testing William Lee Irwin III
2005-06-16 22:25       ` Badari Pulavarty
2005-06-16 22:58         ` William Lee Irwin III

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20050616175130.22572451.akpm@osdl.org \
    --to=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=pbadari@us.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).