From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262876AbVFVHwB (ORCPT ); Wed, 22 Jun 2005 03:52:01 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262893AbVFVHs6 (ORCPT ); Wed, 22 Jun 2005 03:48:58 -0400 Received: from smtp.osdl.org ([65.172.181.4]:22456 "EHLO smtp.osdl.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262842AbVFVGjl (ORCPT ); Wed, 22 Jun 2005 02:39:41 -0400 Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2005 23:39:14 -0700 From: Andrew Morton To: Miklos Szeredi Cc: pavel@ucw.cz, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: -mm -> 2.6.13 merge status (fuse) Message-Id: <20050621233914.69a5c85e.akpm@osdl.org> In-Reply-To: References: <20050620235458.5b437274.akpm@osdl.org> <20050621142820.GC2015@openzaurus.ucw.cz> <20050621220619.GC2815@elf.ucw.cz> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 1.0.4 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-redhat-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Miklos Szeredi wrote: > > > Not so emotional argument... > > > > System where users can mount their own filesystems should not be > > called "Unix" any more. > > It's not. It's "Linux". It would be helpful if we could have a brief description of the feature which you're discussing here. We discussed this a couple of months back, but I've forgotten most of it and it was off-list I think. Doing `grep uid fs/fuse/*.c' gets us to the implementation, yes? Which parts are controversial? How _should_ we implement unprivileged mounts, if not this way?