On Wed, Jun 22, 2005 at 06:46:50PM +0200, M. wrote:
>
>Is it not simpler to ask the reiserfs guys for a detailed explanation
>of why and where this plugins' layer differs from using VFS for
>plugins and let others comment on that ?

I hope this is not FUD or something like that, but it seems to me
the VFS guys are not too willing to implement Reiser4-HiFi stuff anywhere
else, like the VFS, and don't want Reiser4 in, because it duplicates.

Think of the chicken and the egg.

I may be wrong, though.

>If something cant be done using VFS this layer is needed by reiser4
>and has to be merged.

But it's still possible to let Reiser4 in and take them, say, a feature
at a time to the VFS.

Unless it's going to be a political wankfest/pissing contest about
if things like this should even be implemented, anywhere, ever :P

-- 
mjt