From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261993AbVF0Jmn (ORCPT ); Mon, 27 Jun 2005 05:42:43 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261997AbVF0Jmm (ORCPT ); Mon, 27 Jun 2005 05:42:42 -0400 Received: from pentafluge.infradead.org ([213.146.154.40]:33171 "EHLO pentafluge.infradead.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261993AbVF0Jmb (ORCPT ); Mon, 27 Jun 2005 05:42:31 -0400 Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2005 10:42:23 +0100 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Alexander Zarochentsev Cc: David Masover , Jeff Garzik , Hans Reiser , Andrew Morton , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, ReiserFS List Subject: Re: reiser4 plugins Message-ID: <20050627094223.GB5470@infradead.org> Mail-Followup-To: Christoph Hellwig , Alexander Zarochentsev , David Masover , Jeff Garzik , Hans Reiser , Andrew Morton , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, ReiserFS List References: <20050620235458.5b437274.akpm@osdl.org> <42B92AA1.3010107@slaphack.com> <20050626170203.GC18942@infradead.org> <200506271330.07451.zam@namesys.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200506271330.07451.zam@namesys.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i X-SRS-Rewrite: SMTP reverse-path rewritten from by pentafluge.infradead.org See http://www.infradead.org/rpr.html Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Jun 27, 2005 at 01:30:06PM +0400, Alexander Zarochentsev wrote: > -- procfs has seq_file and sysconfig interfaces below the VFS and l-k people > do not complain each day about layering violation ;-) Procfs is taken as an > example because it deals with objects of different types, actually anybody > may create own procfs objects more or less general way. seq_file actually works at the file_operations level, that's exactly what I'm telling you to do. The old sub-callbacks are on their way out. > I don't belive that you want to see all reiser4-specific things as item > plugins, disk format plugins in the VFS. If you'd read the previous discussions you'd see that no one complained about disk format plugins.