From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262637AbVGHGgS (ORCPT ); Fri, 8 Jul 2005 02:36:18 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262628AbVGHGgS (ORCPT ); Fri, 8 Jul 2005 02:36:18 -0400 Received: from dsl027-180-168.sfo1.dsl.speakeasy.net ([216.27.180.168]:36066 "EHLO sunset.davemloft.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262646AbVGHGgH (ORCPT ); Fri, 8 Jul 2005 02:36:07 -0400 Date: Thu, 07 Jul 2005 23:35:30 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <20050707.233530.85417983.davem@davemloft.net> To: ink@jurassic.park.msu.ru Cc: linville@tuxdriver.com, rmk+lkml@arm.linux.org.uk, matthew@wil.cx, grundler@parisc-linux.org, linux-pci@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz, linux-pm@lists.osdl.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, greg@kroah.com, ambx1@neo.rr.com Subject: Re: [patch 2.6.12 (repost w/ corrected subject)] pci: restore BAR values in pci_enable_device_bars From: "David S. Miller" In-Reply-To: <20050708095104.A612@den.park.msu.ru> References: <20050708005701.GA13384@tuxdriver.com> <20050707.201103.41635951.davem@davemloft.net> <20050708095104.A612@den.park.msu.ru> X-Mailer: Mew version 4.2 on Emacs 21.4 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: Ivan Kokshaysky Date: Fri, 8 Jul 2005 09:51:04 +0400 > Why not just implement sparc64 version of pci_update_resource elsewhere > (perhaps a dummy one, if you don't need PCI PM), rather than force the > rest of the world to duplicate the code? That's fine, what would be the most minimal implementation?